good-to-go and
ask for WG adoption.
@Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)<mailto:cschmutz=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>
/others/all – Would like your opinion on to pursue this work with consolidation
to your draft or as separate activity.
Thanks,
Himanshu
From: Karboubi, Amal mailto:akarb...@cien
rantee that
such policies do not violate the BW guarantees of CS-SR policies, but, IMHO and
FWIW, a “pure SR” mechanism preventing such violations is preferable.
My 2c,
Sasha
From: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
mailto:cschm...@cisco.com>>
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2023 10:33 AM
To: Alexande
nsht...@rbbn.com>>
Cc: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
mailto:cschm...@cisco.com>>;
spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>; Dongjie (Jimmy)
mailto:jie.d...@huawei.com>>; Stewart Bryant
mailto:stewart.bry...@gmail.com>>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [spring] A technica
Robert et al,
This draft does not talk about nor does define mechanisms that “emulate”
optical (SONET/SDH, OTN or DWDM) circuits over IP/MPLS. Rather the draft does
describe how various SR methods can be used to establish traffic engineered
paths across an SR network in order to address require
Dear WG,
As a co-author I support the WG adoption of this draft.
This draft does describe how a “transport network centric” behaviour can be
delivered in modern SR networks in an efficient and scalable manner.
Many thanks for the review efforts and inputs from many WG members
regards
Christia
ompete with each other for that set of
shared resources (e.g. due to burst in some CS services)? If so, do you want to
mention this in the draft, and may also provide some approaches to avoid or
mitigate this effect.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz) [mailto:cschm...@cis
Dear WG,
As we are preparing for WG adoption call, could you please let us know if the
concerns have been addressed?
Thanks in advance
Christian
On 15.02.2023, at 19:24, Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
mailto:cschm...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Jie and Sasha,
We recently published a new v
g. sub-interfaces or queue). That could be achieved by using resource-aware
SIDs as defined in draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Vainshtein
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 3:48 PM
To: Christian Schmutzer (cs
Hi Sasha,
Many thanks for reviewing draft-schmutzer-pce-cs-sr-policy
(draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy) and sharing your input / concerns. Let me
try to address them.
CS-SR policies don’t require additional unprotected adj-SIDs. The unprotected
adj-SID part of the two adj-SIDs you mentioned
On 01.06.2022, at 09:42, Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
mailto:cschm...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi,
After the initial hype for PWE3 in the early 2000s we have seen renewed
interest in circuit emulation (TDM PWE3) in 2015 as there was (and still is) a
lot of PDH and SONET/SDH infrastructu
Hi,
After the initial hype for PWE3 in the early 2000s we have seen renewed
interest in circuit emulation (TDM PWE3) in 2015 as there was (and still is) a
lot of PDH and SONET/SDH infrastructure out there that operators can’t get rid
of fast enough while those products go end of life.
We have
11 matches
Mail list logo
