gt;
> Which process are you talking about? Is that documented in an RFC?
> You seem to take it on yourself to represent the "rest of the wg
> participants", but from my perspective it looks like a few very loud voices.
> Perhaps we should let others speak up, if there is anything more to be said
> on thi
g
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------
--
Enno Rey
Cell: +49 173 6745902
Twitter: @Enno_Insinuator
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
rgue on the grounds of technical merit,
and it actually wastes more bandwidth, neutrons and life time of smart people
reading this, in a debate which has already wasted *a lot* of those. May I
hence ask for a response in a direct manner if you e
