Re: [spring] [IPv6] Subject: Mandating SRH when using C-SIDs (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Le 2024-04-05 à 16:30, Tom Herbert a écrit : CAUTION:This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. On Fri, Apr 5, 2024, 8:53 AM Antoine FRESSANCOURT

Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Hi, in my view, this draft doesn't *change* the text of 8200. It provides information on how to determine the DA when C-SIDs are used. -m Le 2024-04-03 à 23:28, Joel Halpern a écrit : CAUTION:This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments

Re: [spring] C-SIDs and upper layer checksums (draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression)

Joel, do you mean specifying the sid *list* as the DA? -m Le 2024-04-04 à 19:26, jmh.direct a écrit : CAUTION:This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. So you can't ping a uSID l

Re: [spring] [IPv6] Requiring Tunneling - subject change

Hi Joel, Le 2024-03-28 à 16:46, Joel Halpern a écrit : CAUTION:This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Robert, as far as I can tell, you are asking for a different change than

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi, I support this document moving forward. As part of the WG LC I'd like to suggest a minor clarification. Document explains the conditions the SID structure shall satisfy for compression to be feasible, which, in my view should not be confused with Segment List Validation (as per rfc9256).

Re: [spring] Fwd: IETF WG state changed for draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression

Hi, I support this document moving forward. As part of the WG LC I'd like to suggest a minor clarification. Document explains the conditions the SID structure shall satisfy for compression to be feasible, which, in my view should not be confused with Segment List Validation (as per rfc9256).