Re: [spring] draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression-02

2021-10-04 Thread Mike Simpson
uot;what’s the worst that could >> happen" after 40 years experience on connected networks, not that prestel >> was that connected. >> >>>> On 3 Oct 2021, at 15:22, Eliot Lear wrote: >>> >>> I'm struggling to understand whether your issue

Re: [spring] draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression-02

2021-10-03 Thread Mike Simpson
Given that every time a vendor suggests altering the fundamentals of the ipv6 header the reason given for not just using encapsulation and therefore avoiding upsetting the 2 decades worth of running kit is to save the few bytes of overhead it would produce. 1) Do we not have enough bogus packe

Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Simpson
On 26 Feb 2020, at 19:16, Warren Kumari wrote: > > I would suggest that people read RFC 7282 - "On Consensus and Humming > in the IETF", especially Sections 3 & 6 (it is a short document, you > should read the whole thing, but pay special attention to these > sections). > > It doesn't really ma