Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srpm-11

Hi, Support. Regards, Nagendra From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 8:52 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "ippm-cha...@ietf.org" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-twamp-srp

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm-03

Hi, Support. Regards, Nagendra From: spring on behalf of James Guichard Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 8:54 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" Cc: "ippm-cha...@ietf.org" , "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gandhi-spring-stamp-srpm

Re: [spring] Codepoint for OSPFv3 protocol in SPRING LSP-Ping and LSP-Trace

Hi Ketan/Mustapha, During the time of this RFC development, we used OSPF as codepoint for both v2 and v3. I think a separate code point for OSPFv3 would be more cleaner. Thanks, Nagendra From: "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 2:31 AM To: "Ketan T

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming

Hi, Support. Regards, Nagendra From: spring On Behalf Of Rob Shakir Sent: 27 June 2019 11:44 To: SPRING WG List Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-programming Hi SPRING WG, This email initiates a two week working group adoption call for draft-xuclad-spring-sr-

Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Support. Regards, Nagendra On 3/13/19, 3:31 PM, "spring on behalf of IETF Secretariat" wrote: The SPRING WG has placed draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programming in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Bruno Decraene) The document is available at htt

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy-02.txt

eview the changes and advise of your comments? Thanks Regards … Zafar From: "internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>" mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>> Date: Monday, October 22, 2018 at 6:19 PM To: "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" m

Re: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy

Hi, I support WG adoption for this document Thanks, Nagendra From: spring on behalf of Rob Shakir Date: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 at 11:21 AM To: SPRING WG List Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy Hi SPRING WG, This email initiates

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping: resolution of issues raised in my RTG-DIR review

below. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:naiku...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:32 PM To: Alexander Vainshtein ; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; m

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping: resolution of issues raised in my RTG-DIR review

Hi Sasha, Please see inline.. Deborah and all, I have read the latest (-11) version of the draft in order to check to which extent my RTG-DIR review comments (that referred to the -06 version of the draft) have been addressed. Here are the results of this check: Major Issue #1 in the -06 ver

Re: [spring] RtgDir review: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-06.txt

Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com From: Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar) [mailto:naiku...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 1:41 AM To: Alexander Vainshtein ; rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: Jonathan Hardwick (jonathan.hardw...@me

Re: [spring] RtgDir review: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-06.txt

Hi Sasha, Thanks for the comments. Please see below: Hi, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request.

Re: [spring] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution

Support. Thanks, Nagendra On 6/29/17, 9:28 AM, "spring on behalf of Martin Vigoureux" wrote: Hello Working Group, This email starts a Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution-04 [1] which is considered mature and ready for a final working group re

Re: [spring] IPR poll on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping

Hi Loa, I am not aware of any IPR on this draft. Thanks, Nagendra On 6/5/17, 3:39 AM, "Loa Andersson" wrote: Working Group, authors, We have started to prepare the the draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping for wglc, prior to the wglc we need to do an IPR poll. This mail sta

Re: [spring] IPR for draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase prior to WGLC

Hi, I am not aware of any other IPR that is not disclosed. Thanks, Nagendra On 7/26/16, 4:43 AM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" wrote: >Hi, > >The datatracker shows two IPR disclosures against this document, with IDs >2314 and 2406. > >I am not aware of any additional and undisclosed IPR direc

Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption call

Support. Regards, Nagendra On 4/14/16, 3:50 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been >requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution. >Please reply to the list with your comments, i

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase

Hi, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR on this document. Thanks, Nagendra On 7/22/15, 1:12 PM, "Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)" wrote: >Support. > >Thanks, >Nagendra > >On 7/22/15, 9:13 AM, "John G. Scudder" wrote: > >>Dear WG, >>

Re: [spring] FW: Adoption Call for

Hi, I have read this draft and support the adoption as WG document. Thanks, Nagendra On 8/6/15, 4:54 PM, "Voyer, Daniel (520309)" wrote: >I have read the draft and support for adoption. > >D. > >On 2015-08-03, 03:35, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com" > wrote: > >>FYI: IPv6 Segmen

Re: [spring] [mpls] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop

Support. Thanks, Nagendra On 7/22/15, 9:17 AM, "John G.Scudder" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been >requested for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop. Please >reply to the list with your comments, including although not li

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase

Support. Thanks, Nagendra On 7/22/15, 9:13 AM, "John G. Scudder" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been >requested for draft-geib-spring-oam-usecase. Please reply to the list >with your comments, including although not limited to whether or

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-msdc

Support. Thanks, Nagendra On 7/22/15, 9:15 AM, "John G.Scudder" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been >requested for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-msdc. Please reply to >the list with your comments, including although not limited t

Re: [spring] working group adoption call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe

Support. Thans, Nagendra On 7/22/15, 9:15 AM, "John G.Scudder" wrote: >Dear WG, > >As we discussed at our meeting yesterday, working group adoption has been >requested for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-central-epe. Please >reply to the list with your comments, including although not lim

Re: [spring] Poll for adoption: draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement

Hi, We have submitted the draft as WG document. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-oam-requirement/ Thanks, Nagendra From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com" mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, June 29, 2015 at 1:13 PM To: "spring@ietf

Re: [spring] Poll for adoption: draft-kumar-spring-sr-oam-requirement

Hi, Yes/Support. As a co-author, I am not aware of any IPR applicable for the draft. Thanks, Nagendra From: "bruno.decra...@orange.com" mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 at 11:06 AM To: "spring@ietf.org"

Re: [spring] Providing unprotected SPRING TE path

Hi Nobo, Do you mean, set the TTL of SBFD session from A to C as 2? (depending on the hops). I am not sure if that will help. Assume (in your topology) the metric between B and C is 10 and A want to avoid link BC. So the normal path from A to D is A-B-E-F-D and using Node SID D is sufficient to ta

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-mpls

Hi, I support the adoption. Thanks, Nagendra From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 9:07 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-m...@tools.ietf.org

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing

Hi, I support the adoption of this document as WG document. Thanks, Nagendra From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> Date: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 9:01 AM To: "spring@ietf.org" mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Cc: "draft-filsfils-spring-segment-rout.