[spring] Re: WG Adoption Call for draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking

2024-10-14 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Boris, Thanks for review and your comments. I have added the diagram in section 7. Will make further changes in next version as per your suggestions below to elaborate and simplify text. Regards Swadesh On 7/19/24, 3:26 PM, "Boris Hassanov" wrote: Hi Bruno and all, I read the draft and su

[spring] Re: draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking

2024-10-03 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Bruno, Thanks for your review and the comments. Please find my response inline starting with[SA]. Sorry for the delay. Regards Swadesh From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 6:30 AM To: SPRING WG Subject: [spring] draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking Dear a

[spring] Re: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-10.txt

2024-07-20 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
at 6:37 AM To: SPRING WG , Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw) Cc: Robert Raszuk Subject: RE: [spring] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-10.txt Authors, You may have missed the comment from Robert (alternatively I may have missed your answer). Probably the adoption call would

[spring] Re: IPR Disclosures for draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking

2024-07-12 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Bruno, I am unaware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft. Regards Swadesh On 7/11/24, 6:23 AM, "bruno.decra...@orange.com" wrote: Dear authors and contributors: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to this draft? If so, has it been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules

Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment

2022-12-06 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
As a contributor, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Regards Swadesh From: James Guichard Date: Monday, November 28, 2022 at 7:10 AM To: SPRING WG Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment Dear WG: This emai

Re: [spring] WG Adoption call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-filsfilscheng-spring-srv6-srh-compression/

2021-10-08 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Chairs, WG, RFC8986 defines multiple flavors for the End, End.X, and End.T SIDs. CSID draft adds next and replace flavors for these SIDs for SRv6 compression in conformance to RFC8986. CSID is a single SRv6 based data plane solution I strongly support the WG adoption call. Regards Swadesh

Re: [spring] draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-02

2021-07-21 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi Rajesh, As specified in the draft-ietf-srv6-services draft, when using transposition scheme prefix SID attribute carries common part of SRv6 SID (example locator). draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car proposes to carry variable part in SRv6 SID TLV in NLRI when same scheme is used. This helps to be effi

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-05.txt

2021-02-24 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
Hi WG, We have posted new version of draft-agrawal-spring-srv6-mpls-interworking-05.txt. The initial version was posted in October 2018; the rev5 provides the additional details. The draft describes solution for the following SRv6 and MPLS interworking scenarios: - Transport interworking, i

Re: [spring] IPR Poll: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment

2019-11-13 Thread Swadesh Agrawal (swaagraw)
I am NOT aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft. Regards Swadesh From: Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 9:04 AM To: "draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segm...@ietf.org" Cc: spring Subject: [spring] IPR Poll: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment Hi Authors, SPRING WG,