Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc & draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc

2018-11-20 Thread stephane.litkowski
raft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc & draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc Hi all, The use case is without TE. And this is how network designs are working today, and I do not see any valid reason to complexify and change the existing designs by introducing controllers or BGP-LS. We have to accommodate with what is

Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc & draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc

2018-11-20 Thread 徐小虎(义先)
: [spring] [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc & draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc Hi all, The use case is without TE. And this is how network designs are working today, and I do not see any valid reason to complexify and change the existing designs by introducing controllers or BGP-LS. We have to accommo

Re: [spring] [Lsr] draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc & draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc

2018-11-19 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi all, The use case is without TE. And this is how network designs are working today, and I do not see any valid reason to complexify and change the existing designs by introducing controllers or BGP-LS. We have to accommodate with what is deployed today and the proposed change is quite