Hi John,
Sorry for the late reply, was on PTO.
Please see my comments below.
Best Regards,
Daniel
On 2018-03-09, 2:14 PM, "John E Drake" wrote:
Daniel,
There work group adoption process started several months ago. We asked Loa
to initiate the process and he asked four member
Daniel,
There work group adoption process started several months ago. We asked Loa to
initiate the process and he asked four members of the MPLS review team to
review the draft, which they subsequently did, with all four indicating that
they thought the draft should be adopted. Then and only
I, too, hope we can move to a technical discussion of the differences between
the proposals and not spend time thrashing around in IETF politics. I'm sure
the ADs will help us understand what is written in the various WG charters, so
our best next step would be to read (you know, like all the wo
Hi,
As co-author of both initial draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining,
draft-clad-spring-segment-routing-service-chaining and the merged
draft-xuclad-spring-sr-service-chaining, I also have concerns about the current
WG adoption process and haste. I do hope we will be in a position to discuss
in
I second the concerns raised by Xiaohu, Francois, and Zafar.
From: mpls on behalf of "Zafar Ali (zali)"
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2018 at 7:02 PM
To: "Francois Clad (fclad)" , "徐小虎(义先)"
Cc: mpls , SPRING WG List , "s...@ietf.org"
, draft-farrel-mpls-sfc ,
mpls-chairs , mpls
Subject: Re: [mp
Dear MPLS WG Chairs and the authors of draft-farrel-mpls-sfc,
I would like to draw your attention to the serious issue raised by Xiaohu and
Francois.
Summary:
Please note that this working group adaption against the IETF process and its
spirit. Please recall the adaption call.
Details:
Just
Francois, Xiaohu,
I fully agree with you.
s.
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 11:20 AM, Francois Clad (fclad) wrote:
>
> Hi Xiaohu, all,
>
> I agree with the point raised by Xiaohu. The draft-farrel-mpls-sfc is copying
> ideas described in draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining. Please note that the work
> i
Hi Xiaohu, all,
I agree with the point raised by Xiaohu. The draft-farrel-mpls-sfc is copying
ideas described in draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining. Please note that the work in
draft-xu-mpls-service-chaining started one year before draft-farrel-mpls-sfc.
At IETF100, three drafts in this area were