Hi,
During WGLC, comments have been sent and 2 versions of the drafts published
(-04, -05).
Can you check whether your comments have been taken into account? (as some
comments have not been fully resolved on the mailing list)
Thanks,
-- Bruno
> From: John G. Scudder > Sent: Wednesday, July 2
Chris,
I will put back the original Mirror Segment section in the draft. In fact we
did have a text for it in the very first instance of the draft
(draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-00)
Thanks.
s.
On Aug 7, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Chris Bowers wrote:
> All,
>
> It appears that section 3.6.3
Hi,
I'm not aware of any IPR
-Original Message-
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John G. Scudder
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 15:12
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: i...@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org; o...@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] working group last call for draft-
All,
It appears that section 3.6.3 of this draft which covers using the binding-sid
to advertise a mirroring context got dropped between
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-00 and draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-01,
in February.Presumably this was done because it didn't have any text in it.
Support.
Cheers,
-Mohan
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:12 AM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> Dear SPRING WG (and cc MPLS, OSPF, IS-IS, 6MAN, please include SPRING in
> replies per the reply-to):
>
> As we discussed at the SPRING meeting yesterday, working group last call has
> been requested for draft-ie
