Re: [spring] [sfc] [mpls] The MPLS WG has placed draft-farrel-mpls-sfc in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2018-03-14 Thread NAPIERALA, MARIA H
The implementations based on draft-ietf-bess-service-chaining-04 are absolutely in production use. Can it be explained what is meant by: “It has a multiplicity of issues, primarily wrt scalability and ease of configuration”? Maria From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Rasz

Re: [spring] [sfc] [mpls] The MPLS WG has placed draft-farrel-mpls-sfc in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2018-03-13 Thread Francois Clad (fclad)
Hi Adrian, On 9 Mar 2018, at 10:17, Adrian Farrel mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk>> wrote: I, too, hope we can move to a technical discussion of the differences between the proposals The issue is that, from a technical point of view, there is no difference between section 6 (MPLS Segment Routing)

Re: [spring] [sfc] [mpls] The MPLS WG has placed draft-farrel-mpls-sfc in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

2018-03-09 Thread Loa Andersson
Zafar, On 2018-03-09 08:02, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote: *Summary*: Please note that this working group adaption against the IETF process and its spirit. Please recall the adaption call. Interesting, can you point me to the RFC and text that we broke? /Loa -- Loa Andersson