Re: [spring] 答复: Re: WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info

2016-08-25 Thread Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
> On Aug 25, 2016, at 4:41 AM, peng.sha...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > Stefano, > > see inline with [Deccan] > > Thanks > Deccan > > > > "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" > 2016-08-23 23:22 > > 收件人 > "peng.sha...@zte.com.cn" , > 抄送 > SPRING WG > 主题 > Re: [spring] WG adoption requested for draft-

[spring] 答复: Re: WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info

2016-08-24 Thread peng . shaofu
Stefano, see inline with [Deccan] Thanks Deccan "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" 2016-08-23 23:22 收件人 "peng.sha...@zte.com.cn" , 抄送 SPRING WG 主题 Re: [spring] WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info Hi Deccan, > On Aug 23, 2016, at 4:39 AM, peng.sha...@zte.c

[spring] 答复: Re: WG adoption requested for draft-filsfils-spring-sr-recursing-info

2016-08-22 Thread peng . shaofu
Hi Stefano Sure, SRRI provided in this document can explicitly indicate a recursive operation (or relationship). But it maybe a default behavior to do recursive operation when an SR-NODE received remote prefix-sid with L/V flag set according to the documents already existed. For example, pref