:28 PM
To: ketant=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:ketant=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Chengli (Cheng Li) mailto:c...@huawei.com>>;
i...@ietf.org<mailto:i...@ietf.org>; spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
Subject: Re:[spring] [Idr] questions about draft-ietf-idr-
@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; i...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re:[spring] [Idr] questions about draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-03
Hi Ketan, Cheng,
Thanks for your reply.
I have get clear answer to my questions.
The third question is meaningless once the typo is corrected.
I also
始邮件
发件人：KetanTalaulikar(ketant)
收件人：Chengli (Cheng Li) ;彭少富10053815;
抄送人：i...@ietf.org ;spring@ietf.org ;
日 期 ：2020年09月09日 15:07
主 题 ：Re: [spring] [Idr] questions about draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-03
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://ww
Hi PSF and Cheng,
Please check inline below.
From: Chengli (Cheng Li)
Sent: 07 September 2020 09:49
To: peng.sha...@zte.com.cn; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
Cc: i...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Idr] questions about draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-03
Hi PSF and Ketan,
IMHO, the SRv6 SID
Hi PSF and Ketan,
IMHO, the SRv6 SID Structure TLV can be included in the sub-TLV field of SRv6
END.X TLV, SRv6 LAN END.X TLV (for adj SIDs) and SRv6 SID NLRI(for node SIDs).
So I guess it may be a typo, the SRv6 End should be SRv6 End.X. We can double
check the IANA section.
But from the tex
