Hi Martin,
I think this draft should be made Proposed Standard.
Regards, Ruediger
--
From: Martin Vigoureux
Subject: Re: [spring] WG LC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing
Date: December 6, 2016 at 2:34:14 PM GMT+1
To:
WG,
this is a reminder, please
As contributor I support the submission of this document to the IESG as a
Proposed Standard.
Cheers,
Jeff
On 11/28/16, 01:37, "spring on behalf of Martin Vigoureux"
wrote:
Hello WG,
this e-mail initiates a two-week WG LC for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing [1].
As co-author, I do support the submission of
this draft to the IESG as a Proposed Standard.
Cheers,
Clarence
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
As a contributor, and from an operator's point of view I support this
document.
Martin
Am 28.11.16 um 10:37 schrieb Martin Vigoureux:
Hello WG,
this e-mail initiates a two-week WG LC for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing [1].
All authors have already replied to the IPR poll.
There is known
As a contributor, and from an operator's point of view I support this
document.
Martin
Am 28.11.16 um 10:37 schrieb Martin Vigoureux:
Hello WG,
this e-mail initiates a two-week WG LC for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing [1].
All authors have already replied to the IPR poll.
There is know
as an author, I support this draft.
s.
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 2:34 PM, Martin Vigoureux
> wrote:
>
> WG,
>
> this is a reminder, please express your opinion regarding this WG LC.
>
> Thank you
>
> -m
>
> Le 28/11/2016 à 10:37, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
>> Hello WG,
>>
>> this e-mail initi
On Nov 30, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> On 30/11/2016 10:38, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
>>> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Stewart Bryant
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The following are my comments on this text in response to the WGLC.
>>> A lot of comments are embedded in the draft text
On 30/11/2016 10:38, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote:
On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
The following are my comments on this text in response to the WGLC.
A lot of comments are embedded in the draft text below.
However I have some major overarching comments. Although this
> On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:21 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
> The following are my comments on this text in response to the WGLC.
> A lot of comments are embedded in the draft text below.
>
> However I have some major overarching comments. Although this is called
> an architecture it seems to be rat
The following are my comments on this text in response to the WGLC.
A lot of comments are embedded in the draft text below.
However I have some major overarching comments. Although this is called
an architecture it seems to be rather more of a description of how
a large number of other documents
Hello WG,
this e-mail initiates a two-week WG LC for
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing [1].
All authors have already replied to the IPR poll.
There is known IPR [2] on this document.
Please read the latest version of the document and state whether or not
you support the submission of this do
11 matches
Mail list logo
