Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Hi, Alvaro, We just posted rev -09, addressing these. Please note that regarding "2. [nit]”, we left the additional references. For example, rfc7880 in itself is not sufficient, and rfc7881 defines S-BFD for MPLS. rfc7882 specifically talks about this use case in Section 3.4 and therefore seem

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

I'll take care of it. Thanks! Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro. Excuze typofraphicak errows On Jul 25, 2017, at 18:42, Alvaro Retana (aretana) mailto:aret...@cisco.com>> wrote: Hi! I looked -08 and almost everything looks good to me. The only exception is the result from the comment below:

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Hi! I looked -08 and almost everything looks good to me. The only exception is the result from the comment below: 1. All the new references should be Informative as they seem to just be examples: “Packets from a variety of protocols can be used to check continuity. These include…”. 2.

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

___ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Many thanks for your detailed review, Alvaro! Alvaro, Bruno, Please find inline a couple additional comments (also marked “ED”) in addition to the editor comments on Ruediger’s response. > On Jun 30, 2017, at 9:08 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com > wrote: > > H

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Hi Ruediger, Please see inline [Bruno] From: ruediger.g...@telekom.de [mailto:ruediger.g...@telekom.de] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 8:52 AM To: aret...@cisco.com Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org; DECRAENE Bruno IMT/OLN; spring@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-oam-usec...@ietf.org Subject: AW: AD Review of

Re: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Hi Alvaro, we are fine, hope you are too - thanks for your review and comments. As we work with two editors, our comments are marked [ED]. [AR] Major: [AR] M1. The Introduction says that the monitoring system described in this document will be simplified “by enabling MPLS topology detection b

[spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-oam-usecase-06

Dear authors: Hi! How are you? I just finished reading this document. Thank you for using a more descriptive name for this document. I have some comments (please see below) that I would like to see addressed before putting this document up for review by the IESG. I am however starting the