Alvaro –
V14 of the draft has been posted.
Responses to your comments inline.
From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 12:55 PM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-segment-rout...@ietf.org; spring-cha...@ietf.org;
spring@ietf.org
Subje
Alvaro –
Sorry, I was waiting for a new rev of the draft addressing the second round of
comments to be ready to publish. That is in progress – Ahmed and I are still
working to resolve some overlap between architecture document and sr mpls
document – but we hope to have new versions soon.
In th
Les:
Hi!
I don’t think I got a reply on the IPR question below.
Thanks!
Alvaro.
On November 1, 2017 at 3:55:00 PM, Alvaro Retana (aretana.i...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Les:
Hi!
Apologies for the long delay in responding. The transference of the pen
from Stefano resulted in a longer delay than it s
On November 2, 2017 at 7:59:31 AM, stefano previdi (stef...@previdi.net)
wrote:
Stefano:
Hi!
> I would also strongly recommend that you include a Deployment/Operations
Section.
what exactly would you expect to find in such section ? We have the
Manageability section which illustrates how SR ca
> On Nov 1, 2017, at 8:55 PM, Alvaro Retana wrote:
>
> On October 28, 2017 at 10:51:52 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> (ginsb...@cisco.com ) wrote:
> Les:
>
> Hi!
>
>> Apologies for the long delay in responding. The transference of the pen from
>> Stefano resulted in a longer delay than it sho
On October 28, 2017 at 10:51:52 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (
ginsb...@cisco.com ) wrote:
Les:
Hi!
Apologies for the long delay in responding. The transference of the pen
from Stefano resulted in a longer delay than it should have.
Thanks for taking this on!
As a new author: are you aware of
; Martin Vigoureux
mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com>>
Subject: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document – sorry for the delay in processing.
Thanks for all the work you’ve but into this document!
I have some significant concerns (see
lf of Alvaro Retana
>
>Date: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 3:00 PM
>To: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-rout...@ietf.org"
>
>Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" ,
>"spring@ietf.org" , Martin Vigoureux
>
>Subject: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-rou
: Thursday, August 10, 2017 at 3:00 PM
To: "draft-ietf-spring-segment-rout...@ietf.org"
Cc: "spring-cha...@ietf.org" , "spring@ietf.org"
, Martin Vigoureux
Subject: [spring] AD Review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-12
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing
Dear authors:
I just finished reviewing this document – sorry for the delay in processing.
Thanks for all the work you’ve but into this document!
I have some significant concerns (see below for details). In general, the
document presents an incomplete view of the architecture: details about
10 matches
Mail list logo
