Hi Fan,
More discussions on whether the redundancy/merging segment is a
topological/routable segment.
In case of SR-MPLS, draft-geng says:
In SR over MPLS, Redundancy Segment acts as DetNet S-Label to
explicitly identify the replication function on redundancy node.
Redundancy segment i
Hi Fan,
Sorry for the late response. Please see zzh> below.
From: Yangfan (IP Standard)
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 9:20 AM
To: Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang ; 'Rishabh Parekh'
Cc: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) ; 'Rishabh Parekh
(riparekh)' ; 'Arvind Venkateswaran (arvvenka)'
; 'spring@ietf.org'
Subj
Hi Jeffrey,
To summarize the discussions a bit, I have two questions and hope to hear your
comments and clarifications.
Q1: Are there any questions for clarifications or open issues with the current
solution of redundancy-SID+Merging-SID+redundancy policy? If so, we would like
to clarify them f
ekh (riparekh)
mailto:ripar...@cisco.com>>; Arvind Venkateswaran
(arvvenka) mailto:arvve...@cisco.com>>
主题: [spring] Comments on draft-geng-spring-sr-redundancy-protection
Hi Xuesong, Mach, Fan,
Some comments/questions on the proposal.
1. We don't need an additional "
Hi Xuesong, Mach, Fan,
Some comments/questions on the proposal.
1. We don't need an additional "redundancy segment" for the replication
semantics. Existing "replication segment"
(draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment) can be used as is, especially for
the scenario where the original header
