Hi,
Thank you for keeping the BFD WG in the loop. I don't have any comments on the
correlation, will leave that to SPRING.
My only question for now is regarding the use of S-BFD echo packets. RFC7880
recommends to also use S-BFD control packets when using S-BFD echo because a
transit node could
Hi Reshad
thanks for your comments.
Yes, for the decription of S-BFD echo, it's a writing mistake
We will update the draft to control packet.
Best Wishes
Lihao
From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Reshad Rahman
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2022 9:08 AM
To: rtg-
Hi WG ,Chairs:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lin-sbfd-path-consistency-over-srv6-00
This document describes a method to keep the forward path and
reverse path of S-BFD consistent when detecting SRv6 Policy.
There is no meeting for bfd in IETF-113, we will present this draft in sp
