Hello Stewart,
Thanks for your review and comments.
We will update the draft and focus on the use case where the ipv6 dataplane is
used without any presence of mpls. This addresses the requirements expressed by
ipv6 network where, by design policy, mpls dataplane is not used.
Regards
Roberta
-
Hi Stewart,
>
Yes, but those are required anyway to support SRv6
That is incorrect.
Please watch Les's presentation during last IETF where he clearly and
correctly stated that IGP extensions for SRv6 are optional and not required
(unlike in the case of SR-MPLS where such signalling of global l
On 05/05/2017 11:17, Robert Raszuk wrote:
And to add one observation ..
Stewart makes a point that SR-MPLS can be deployed without mpls
control plane.
Well it sure does not require LDP however IGP or BGP extensions for
SR-MPLS signalling is also an example of mpls control plane ... even
i
> On May 5, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>
> On 04/05/2017 21:20, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
>> On 5/2/17, 12:57 PM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote:
>>
>> Stewart:
>>
>> Hi! How are you?
>>
>> Thanks for the detailed review!
>>
>>> A significant part of the justification seems t
And to add one observation ..
Stewart makes a point that SR-MPLS can be deployed without mpls control
plane.
Well it sure does not require LDP however IGP or BGP extensions for SR-MPLS
signalling is also an example of mpls control plane ... even if much
simpler than traditional cases it is still
> On May 5, 2017, at 11:52 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
> Alternatively maybe it would be better to have a single use case: Operators
> that wish to deploy SR without an MPLS control plane,
I’d agree with the above. Let’s simplify the document with, at the end, what is
the simplest and most e
On 04/05/2017 21:20, Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
On 5/2/17, 12:57 PM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote:
Stewart:
Hi! How are you?
Thanks for the detailed review!
A significant part of the justification seems to evolve around the
inability of MPLS to function in an IPv6 only network.
It seems to
On 5/2/17, 12:57 PM, "Stewart Bryant" wrote:
Stewart:
Hi! How are you?
Thanks for the detailed review!
> A significant part of the justification seems to evolve around the
> inability of MPLS to function in an IPv6 only network.
It seems to me that this statement summarizes many of the conce
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more info
