Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

est regards, > > Jie > > > > *From:* Gyan Mishra [mailto:hayabusa...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 23, 2024 2:02 PM > *To:* Dongjie (Jimmy) > *Cc:* Alexander Vainshtein ; > draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segme...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re:

Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments Hi Jie I understand the draft proposes an extension to existing topological SIDs to carry the resource attributes. However since this draft proposes a new resource attributes extension encoding

Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

e opinions from the WG participants, and > follow the decision of the WG. > > > > Best regards, > > Jie > > > > *From:* spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org ] *On > Behalf Of *Alexander Vainshtein > *Sent:* Sunday, January 21, 2024 2:16 PM > *To:* draft-ietf-spring-res

Re: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

to:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments Hello, I have read the draft<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments-08>, and I do not have any technical comments on it. At the same time, I wonde

[spring] Intended status of draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments

Hello, I have read the draft, and I do not have any technical comments on it. At the same time, I wonder why its intended status appears as "Standard Track": 1. The draft does not define any new mechanisms