Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-09 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA)
Mustapha (Nokia - CA) Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, I read slides 17-21 of the document you referenced below and I have the following c

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-05 Thread bruno.decraene
[mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was f

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-05 Thread bruno.decraene
ontroller which does not implement conflict resolution should be considered. Les From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 5:50 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> Cc: spring@ietf.org

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-05 Thread bruno.decraene
o:spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, As a individual contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-01 Thread Marc Binderberger
boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aissaoui, > Mustapha (Nokia - CA) > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal > > Hi Les, > I read slides 17-21 of the document you re

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-01 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Marc > -Original Message- > From: Marc Binderberger [mailto:m...@sniff.de] > Sent: Friday, December 30, 2016 11:53 PM > To: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA); Robert Raszuk; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: spring@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution:

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2017-01-01 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, I read slides 17-21 of the document you refer

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-30 Thread Marc Binderberger
gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert > Raszuk > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 5:29 PM > To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > Cc: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) ; > spring@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal > > Les, > > After menta

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-23 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA)
) ; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Les, After mental reset I conclude that perhaps even the introduction of the draft is questionable as in real life it applies to be quite an unrealistic scenario to have a situation where more then one protocol

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-23 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA)
[mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, I read slides 17-21 of the do

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
(ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org; Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, > ​ OSPF on Router #1 advertises 1.1.1.1/32<http://1.1.1.1/32> w SID 100 > OSPF on Router #2 advertises 2.2.2.2/32<http://2.2.2.2/32> w SID 100

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Robert Raszuk
ilto:rras...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert > Raszuk > *Sent:* Thursday, December 22, 2016 2:29 PM > > *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > *Cc:* Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA); spring@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal > > > &g

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA); spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Les, After mental reset I conclude that perhaps even the introduction of the draft is questionable as in real life it applies to be quite an

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Robert Raszuk
as...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Robert > Raszuk > *Sent:* Thursday, December 22, 2016 11:52 AM > *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > *Cc:* Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA); spring@ietf.org > > *Subject:* Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal > > > > Hi Les, > >

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
); spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, On #1 I am also with Mustapha here. For clarity of this discussion can you enumerate when from RIB to FIB/LFIB you are installing the exact same active prefix from more then one producer ? Is SRMS sort of

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Robert Raszuk
t:* Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM > *To:* Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal > > > > Hi Les, > > I read slides 17-21 of the document you referenced below and I have the > following commen

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Mustapha - From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA) Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2016 8:10 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, I read slides 17-21 of the

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-22 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA)
04, 2016 7:04 PM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the authors defined the following priorities: 1)Detect the probl

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-21 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
should be considered. Les From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 5:50 PM To: bruno.decra...@orange.com Cc: spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Bruno - From: bruno.decra...

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-21 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
; [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 2:07 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: RE: SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, As a individual contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno]

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-21 Thread bruno.decraene
questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-14 Thread bruno.decraene
tf.org> Subject: RE: SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, As a individual contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-12 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
dual contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-12 Thread bruno.decraene
org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-10 Thread Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
:29 To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , "spring@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Inline: GV> From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Friday, 9 December 2016 at 22:43 To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" , &

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
Inline: GV> From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" Date: Friday, 9 December 2016 at 22:43 To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" , "spring@ietf.org" Subject: RE: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Gunter – It is a misunderstanding to think that

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Robert - From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 2:00 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Cc: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE); spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Dear Les, > This

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Robert Raszuk
and > reporting the conflicts – not spending cycles implementing the most robust > means of trying to operate optimally while the misconfiguration exists.”* > > > > * Les* > > > > > > *From:* Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE) [mailto:gunter.van_de_velde@ >

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE) [mailto:gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com] Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 12:11 PM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal The method to “maximize forwarding” as mentioned in the draft seems to be in

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
To: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the authors defined the following priorities: 1)Detect the problem 2)Report the problem This alerts the net

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
ber 04, 2016 7:04 PM To: spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the authors defined the following priorities: 1)Detect the

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread Aissaoui, Mustapha (Nokia - CA)
rg Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the authors defined the following priorities: 1)Detect the problem 2)Report the problem This alerts the network operator to the ex

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-09 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi Les, As a individual contributor, please find below some clarification questions [Bruno] From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 1:04 AM To: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-08 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
ilto:shrad...@juniper.net] Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2016 5:36 AM To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org Subject: RE: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal Hi Les, The newer approach describes the conflict resolution for the SRMS entries. How is the conflict resolved across individ

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-08 Thread Shraddha Hegde
resolving the Conflicts such that individual advertisements always wins. Rgds shraddha From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 5:34 AM To: spring@ietf.org Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-05 Thread Jeff Tantsura
+1 Cheers, Jeff From: spring on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" Date: Monday, December 5, 2016 at 08:28 To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" , "spring@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal I like the proposal

Re: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-05 Thread John E Drake
g)" mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com>> Date: Sunday, December 4, 2016 at 7:04 PM To: "spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>" mailto:spring@ietf.org>> Subject: [spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-confli

[spring] SID Conflict Resolution: A Simpler Proposal

2016-12-04 Thread Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
When the problem addressed by draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution was first presented at IETF 94, the authors defined the following priorities: 1)Detect the problem 2)Report the problem This alerts the network operator to the existence of a conflict so that the configuration error can be c