5xEKDs38u3J5OY263fSOOb7ou7tnBvTThZk5nZKz-U1v$>
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
> *Sent:* Monday, November 18, 2019, 11:42
> *To:* Alexander Vainshtein
> *Cc:* John E Drake; spring@ietf.org;
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replicatio
a...@tools.ietf.org) ; Ketan Talaulikar
(ketant) ; Greg Mirsky
Subject: RE: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Jeffrey,
Lots of thanks for a detailed response.
You response seems to indicate that the Replicat
)
Cc: John E Drake ; spring@ietf.org;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: RE: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi Sasha,
org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi Ketan,
thank you for your thoughtful consideration of my comment. In the
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment I find the following statement:
org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Dear colleagues,
I would like to clarify why, from my POV, the Replication Segment introduces in
this draft requires extensions to SR Architecture as define
@ietf.org;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
; bruno.decra...@orange.com; Greg Mirsky
; Rob Shakir ; pengshup...@huawei.com
Subject: RE: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption&qu
has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi all,
I have a question regarding adoption of
draft-voyer-sr-spring-replication-segment as a SPRING WG document.
These concerns are based on the following:
1. This draft (both based on
ng-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
> ; (
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG
> Adoption"
>
>
>
> Hi Ketan,
>
> thank you
raft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org>;
mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>>
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>)
mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>>
;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: RE: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi Sasha,
Thanks for your clarifications and
E Drake ; spring@ietf.org;
Alexander Vainshtein ;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi Ketan,
thank you for your suggestion. As you've pointed out, the draft in discussion
introduces a new segment type, Replication Segment, to realize p2mp behavior i
;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Dear colleagues,
I would like to clarify why, from my POV, the Replication Segment introduces in
this draft requires extens
obert Raszuk mailto:rob...@raszuk.net>>
Cc: spr...@ietf..org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org>;
mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>>
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org<mail
r 2019 11:39
> *To:* John E Drake
> *Cc:* spring@ietf.org; Alexander Vainshtein <
> alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com>;
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
> ; (
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] The SP
Vainshtein ;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; Robert Raszuk
;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Dear All,
I concur with Sasha and John
gt;>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:40 PM John E Drake wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I think Sasha has a valid point. Further, ingress replication has been
>> pa
org>;
mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>>
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org<mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>)
mailto:spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adopt
ing@ietf.org;
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; <
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org> (spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org) <
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state &quo
f.org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Hi John,
> Further, ingress replication has been part of MVPN since forever.
Just curious how is this at all relevant for this discussion ?
Do I hav
t; *Sent:* Wednesday, November 13, 2019 9:26 AM
> *To:* Robert Raszuk
> *Cc:* spring@ietf.org;
> draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf.org; <
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org> (spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org) <
> spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re:
;
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment.auth...@ietf..org;
(spring-cha...@tools.ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Robert,
Lots of thanks for a prompt response.
You seem to im
: Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Sasha,
If I have some content and I send it to you and your neighbour as two unicast
streams am I suddenly doing multicast ?
IMHO N number of replicated unicasts is s
> -Original Message-
> From: spring On Behalf Of IETF Secretariat
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:06 PM
> To: draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segm...@ietf.org;
> spring-cha...@ietf..org; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-voyer-sp
he SPRING WG has placed
draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Bruno Decraene)
The document is available at
https://clicktime.s
The SPRING WG has placed draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Bruno Decraene)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-voyer-spring-sr-replication-segment/
Comment:
IPR call:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spr
26 matches
Mail list logo
