Folks,
I'm trying to come up with a list of the issues raised during the WGLC
of this document.
So far, this is what I have:
1) Participants requested a justification for the need of PSP
(Penultimate Segment Pop). [PSP-R]
2) Participants noted that PSP violates RFC8200 [IPV6-V]
3) Participants noted that PSP violates the specification of routing
headers [SR-V]
4) Participants requested a more prescriptive SID format [SID]
Is there anything I've missed?
References:
[IPV6-V]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/XZ_D_cfPNNzXpi4_ZbuTidMTo4k/
[PSP-R]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/eSP4xVYVgjtCmAMGMkqHedv80jU/
[SID]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/2ApHpreqPTS689pAEyhiZEdTf7k/
[SR-V]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/Xrcclo0s4pnug9upG9rUinYMv1I/
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
