Re: [spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH TLVs

2023-03-02 Thread xiao.min2
Thanks to WG Chairs for initiate such an interesting discussion. I'd like to share my thoughts on this, please see inline... Original From: JoelHalpern To: SPRING WG List ; Date: 2023年02月22日 22:38 Subject: [spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH

Re: [spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH TLVs

2023-02-28 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Joel, Thanks for bringing up this important point for discussion. In my view there are two aspects into how we evaluate this choice: * If the information element is not generically applicable to all IPv6 nodes it should ideally not go into a destination option. The IPv6 option space is pre

Re: [spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH TLVs

2023-02-22 Thread Robert Raszuk
Hi Joel, > Clearly there are some pieces of information that are closely tied to the SRH IMHO anything that requires some action on the segment endpoints (for example segment by segment performance measurement) is "closely tied to the SRH". Since processing of TLVs is subject to local configurat

[spring] Usage of DoH vs SRH TLVs

2023-02-22 Thread Joel Halpern
The SPRING WG Chairs have noticed several recent discussions which wound around to the question of whether specific information belongs in a Destination Option Header (DOH) before the SHR, or belongs in an SRH TLV.  Clearly there are some pieces of information that are closely tied to the SRH,