gt;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Peter Psenak (ppsenak)
> > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 12:31 AM
> > To: Uma Chunduri; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
> > Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; bruno.decra...@orange.com
> > Subject: Re: [spring] draft-
ge.com
> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
> call
>
> Uma,
>
> I don't know whether you need a text in the draft/RFC to use some
> functionality one way or the other. The fact is that SRMS is a SID
> provisioning
> tool. You can
2016 11:03 AM
To: Uma Chunduri; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); spring@ietf.org; bruno.decra...@orange.com
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG
adoption call
Hi Uma,
On 5/12/16 19:49 , Uma Chunduri wrote:
Stefano,
Thanks for your response.
&g
gt; From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:46 AM
> To: Uma Chunduri
> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg);
> bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>;
> spring@ietf.org<mailto:spring@ietf.org>
> Su
ssage-
From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:46 AM
To: Uma Chunduri
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
On May 6, 2016,
-Original Message-
From: Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [mailto:sprev...@cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 4:46 AM
To: Uma Chunduri
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
Dear WG,
Draft has been accepted as a WG document.
Authors, please resubmit as draft-ietf-spring-conflict-resolution
Thanks,
--Bruno and John
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:55 AM
>
> > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:51
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
> (ginsberg)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:38 AM
> To: Uma Chunduri; bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
> call
>
> Uma –
>
> To rest
Behalf Of Les Ginsberg
(ginsberg)
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 9:38 AM
To: Uma Chunduri; bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
Uma -
To restate, the problem being addressed here is to guarantee consistent use o
Les,
Your draft represents a view from only a single domian perspective and a
lot of wording there seems to imply that conflict resolution must be global
per router and does not depend on the RIB/FIB context.
Perhaps you are not considering identical SIDs to be used for example by
L3VPN customer
(ginsberg); bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
Les,
With all due respects, cross protocol verification of prefix and SID conflicts
as an "architectural change" and it can severely impact th
ot applicable to all protocols.
In-line [Uma]:
--
Uma C.
From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2016 10:11 PM
To: Uma Chunduri; bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
] On Behalf Of Uma Chunduri
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 4:31 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
Dear Authors,
Have few comments on the draft:
1.
As I indicated during meeting - I am not
tf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
call
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com<mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com> > Sent:
> Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:51
> AM
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As we discussed at our meeting last week
Support.
From an operator's point of view I see strong need for covering this topic.
Best regards, Martin
Am 14.04.16 um 09:50 schrieb bruno.decra...@orange.com:
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-r
Support adoption...
-Jon
___
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
+1
-Original Message-
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 09:51
To: spring@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption call
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting
Support.
Regards,
Nagendra
On 4/14/16, 3:50 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
>Dear WG,
>
>As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
>requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
>Please reply to the list with your comments, i
Support. Very much needed
Ahmed
On 4/14/2016 12:50 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
Please reply to the list with your comments, including although n
t; Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution - WG adoption
>> call
>>
>> > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:51
>> > AM
>> >
>> > Dear WG,
>> >
>> > As we discussed at our mee
Support as co-author.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 12:55 AM
> To: spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolu
I support WG adoption. The conflict resolution document is required for
standard SID conflict error handling across all protocols and vendors.
Thanks,
Acee
On 4/14/16, 3:50 AM, "spring on behalf of bruno.decra...@orange.com"
wrote:
>Dear WG,
>
>As we discussed at our meeting last week, working g
Support the WG adoption as co-author.
thanks,
Peter
On 4/14/16 09:50 , bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
Please reply to the list with your comments, incl
as co-author, I support the WG adoption of this draft
s.
> On Apr 14, 2016, at 9:50 AM, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
> requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
> Please reply to the
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com > Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:51 AM
>
> Dear WG,
>
> As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
> requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
> Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not l
Dear WG,
As we discussed at our meeting last week, working group adoption has been
requested for draft-ginsberg-spring-conflict-resolution.
Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to
whether or not you support adoption.
Thanks,
--John and Bruno
__
26 matches
Mail list logo
