@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding-14: Post
convergence path
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Shraddha,
On 26/07/2021 22:16, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
> WG,
>
> Regarding Peter’s comment on the mic that TI-LFA can divert from post
>
+1
S
> On 26 Jul 2021, at 21:26, Peter Psenak
> wrote:
>
> Hi Shraddha,
>
> On 26/07/2021 22:16, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
>> WG,
>> Regarding Peter’s comment on the mic that TI-LFA can divert from post
>> convergence path when SRLG is used for computation I would like to clarify >
>> that an
Hi Shraddha,
On 26/07/2021 22:16, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
WG,
Regarding Peter’s comment on the mic that TI-LFA can divert from post
convergence path when SRLG is used for computation I would like to clarify > that an operator is expected to do planning for the post convergence
path accounting f
Isn’t the point about TI-LFA that it re-routes on the post convergence path to
avoid micro-loops.
When you overestimate the failure to provide node protection even though the
failure was not a node failure, the repair path may not be congruent with the
post convergence path in which case you n
WG,
Regarding Peter's comment on the mic that TI-LFA can divert from post
convergence path when SRLG
is used for computation I would like to clarify that an operator is expected to
do
planning for the post convergence path accounting for the SRLG failures.
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-
