[spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-07-12 Thread bruno . decraene
Hi authors, Since Jim is now the responsible AD, the shepherd for this document has been changed from Jim to myself. As a result you/this document benefit/suffer from another review. Please find below my comments/questions. On a side note, I have two questions for you (for the shepherd writeup)

[spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-08-02 Thread bruno . decraene
Hi Royi Zigler, Han Li, authors, Regarding authors replies to the IPR polls, I could find the following ones, but I couldn't find the ones from Royi Zigler and Han Li. * If I missed then, could you please point them to me. * If authors forgot to reply, could you please reply on the SPRI

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-07-31 Thread Cheng Li
Hi Bruno, Stewart and Ketan, We have upload a new revision to address your comments. Please review the update. I also sent emails to you separately, we can follow up the detailed discussion in those threads if you want. Hope the update work. Thanks, Li Cheng From: Cheng Li Sent: Monday, July

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-08-02 Thread bruno . decraene
Hi Cheng, Thanks for the updated draft. Please see some follow-up points inline [Bruno]. Orange Restricted From: Cheng Li mailto:c...@huawei.com>> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 12:43 PM To: DECRAENE Bruno INNOV/NET mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com>>; draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segm...@ietf.o

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-08-03 Thread Royi Zigler
Hi @bruno.decra...@orange.com , I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document. Thanks, Sorry for the late reply On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 6:50 PM wrote: > Hi Royi Zigler, Han Li, authors, > > > > > > Regarding authors replies to the IPR polls, I could find the following > ones, b

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-08-03 Thread Cheng Li
Hi Bruno, Many thanks for your reply. I think most of your comments have been addressed. Please check. I copy the only one left here for better discussion. - §2 "The value of the TTL field in the MPLS label stack entry containing the PSID MUST be set to the same value as the TTL of the las

Re: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment

2023-09-06 Thread Cheng Li
Wonderful. I will add the section ASAP. SPRING, if you would like to share your implementation status of this draft, please share the info to the list or to authors or me directly, many thanks. I guess we will update the draft within a week. Thanks, Cheng From: bruno.decra...@orange.com Sent