Hi Ruediger,
Many thanks for your email. Glad you appreciate the PT proposal for SRv6
networks.
We have experimental implementation at linerate in Broadcom Jericho 2, Cisco
Silicon One, Marvell Prestera, and Cisco ASR9k (as well of opensource
software). It would be great to hear from other vend
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the review and comments. Please find Inline [AA]
From: Greg Mirsky
Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 02:25
To: Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels) ,
draft-filsfils-spring-path-trac...@ietf.org
Cc: spring@ietf.org , spring-cha...@ietf.org
, i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New
Hi Tal.
Thanks for the review and comments. Please find Inline [AA]
From: Tal Mizrahi
Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 11:28
To: Ahmed Abdelsalam (ahabdels) ,
spring@ietf.org , i...@ietf.org ,
draft-filsfils-spring-path-trac...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ippm] FW: New Version Notification for
dr
Dear authors,
Thanks for sharing this interesting draft.
Per-hop measurement and reporting is a very important OAM tool, and
there is quite a bit of ongoing / previously proposed work in the IETF
about this topic.
A few comments:
1. It looks like the draft defines two aspects: (a) the path traci
Hi Ahmed and the Authors,
thank you for sharing this information. I've read the draft and have
several questions and comments:
- It is not clear if you propose a new active measurement protocol or
view it as a hybrid method (based on RFC 7799 classification). On one hand,
packets are refe
