ty.
>>>>>
>>>>> best of health to you,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> scot deal
>>>>> excelsior fire
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know
lls-two-following-tsunami-like-wave
Scot Deal
Excelsior Fire Engineering
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachment
s/20121116/9d054781/attachment.html<
http://fireball.fires
rticle/185855/250/Massive-water-tank-bu
>> rsts-kills-two-following-tsunami-like-wave<
http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/185855/250/Massive-water-tank-bursts-kills-two-following-tsunami-like-wave
>
>>
>> Scot Deal
>> Excelsior Fire Engineering
>> -
> >> bolted tank? I am doing no litigation work, nor I am being paid by any
> >> party relative to this incident.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/185855/250/Massive-water-tank-bu
> >
55/250/Massive-water-tank-bu
>> rsts-kills-two-following-tsunami-like-wave<http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/article/185855/250/Massive-water-tank-bursts-kills-two-following-tsunami-like-wave>
>>
>> Scot Deal
>> Excelsior Fire Engineering
>> -- next part
t Deal
> Excelsior Fire Engineering
> ------ next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> <
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachment
> s/20121116/9d054781/attach
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachment
s/20121116/9d054781/attachment.html>
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprink
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20121116/9d054781/attachment.html>
___
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
Ron,
All of that information should have been clearly defined and addressed
in the specifications and on the drawings. The sprinkler contractor
should not have to dig through a mountain of paperwork to get an answer
that should have been clearly defined in the contract documents. The
wording in th
If the EP Engineer on this project wants to "back charge" the contractor
because the FP engineer did not define the scope of work correctly then
the contractor should call the following, and note that the FPE has not
defined the scope of work correctly and if what the FPE shows does not
comply with
Yes, except for the basement. It says the basement is one area but it is also
not a full basement and is much smaller than the first floor, if that matters
at all. We are trying to obtain a copy of the life safety report, maybe this
has all been addressed?
Ron Fletcher
Aero Phoenix
-Origin
Anything on the architect's 'building code analysis' sheet that indicates
the addition is a separate building from the existing?
Ed Kramer
Lawrence, KS
> -Original Message-
> From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-
> boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of r
7.5.1 doesn't say systems because it should be a single system. A.7.5 mentions
systems on the same water supply but in different bldgs.
I would still submit an RFI to get their design intent in writing.
- Original Message -
From: rfletc...@aerofire.com [mailto:rfletc...@aerofire.com]
S
There is a rated wall with horizontal exits separating the addition from the
existing on two floors. A nationally known FP consultant did a one line drawing
of the SP system in the addition and specified a 750 gpm pump. They didn't show
hose valves on either side of the horizontal exits and didn
First, where two or more standpipes are in the same building or section, they
shall be interconnected (14:7.5.1).
If for whatever reason they don't get interconnected (ie different bldgs or
different fire areas), then you could do 500+250 as they would be treated as
two systems. See A.7.10.1.1
15 matches
Mail list logo
