I concur with your approach. I believe we say under doors in storage is a OH
RH
Roland Huggins, PE
Senior Vice President, Engineering & Technical Services
American Fire Sprinkler Association
p: 214-349-5965 ext121
w: firesprinkler.org <http://firesprinkler.org/>
<https://www.facebook.com/firesprinkler.org/>
<https://twitter.com/afsa/status/1039528345367732224>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-fire-sprinkler-association-afsa-/>
<https://www.instagram.com/firesprinklerorg/>
Inspect. Test. Maintain. AFSA’s ITM Inspector Development Program provides OJT
guidance, web and in-person instruction, hands-on learning, and more. Enroll
now for October launch. Be NICET I ready by this Spring, with the goal of NICET
II in just 20 months. Learn more. <http://www.firesprinkler.org/itm>
> On Aug 23, 2019, at 3:31 PM, Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum
> <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
>
> I agree with everything. This wasnt even my project. Was helping out a
> customer of a colleague.
>
> My initial reaction was of course a single EC sidewall for LH is acceptable.
> The installing contractor was pushing back saying you couldn’t do an EC HSW
> for light hazard under the door. That was when I started to dig further and
> noticed the missing wording in EC HSW.
>
> Installer was pushing back an ECOH HSW would cause the overhead to over
> discharge and no longer work. I suggested to stop spending so much time and
> $$ on this. Go with the ECOH HSW and pipe with same size as overhead branch
> piping. That way there can be no push back.
>
> Just another fun Friday at the office.
>
> Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
> 480-505-9271
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
