RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates)

2021-02-06 Thread Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
: travis.m...@mfpdesign.com Subject: Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates) But domestic demand is added at the split with domestic and fire. The domestic wouldn’t flow through standpipes. It would have to be some crazy accessory use. Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, COC, SET Engineering Man

Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates)

2021-02-06 Thread Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum
February 6, 2021 2:27:55 PM To: 'Jose Anibal Castillo' ; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org ; st...@protectiondesign.com ; sbi...@wenteplumbing.com Cc: d...@engfirepro.com Subject: RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates) I suspect that requirement is due more to the Domestic Demand

RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates)

2021-02-06 Thread David L. Miller, P.E. via Sprinklerforum
nal Message- > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto: > sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jose Anibal > Castillo via Sprinklerforum > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2021 7:43 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > Cc: Jose Anibal Castillo > Subje

Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 - (flow rates)

2021-02-06 Thread Jose Anibal Castillo via Sprinklerforum
..." > > > Today's Topics: > >1. RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 (Steve Leyton) >2. RE: Existing Dry System (Chris Dorn) >3. Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 (Skyler Bilbo) >4. Re: Existing Dry System (Skyler Bilbo) >5. Slopes / Storage / UFC 3-600-01 change

Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
org] On Behalf Of Jose Anibal > Castillo via Sprinklerforum > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2021 7:43 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > Cc: Jose Anibal Castillo > Subject: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 > > In section 7.10.1.3.1.1 of the nfpa 14, 2019 states that in cases

RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
orum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Jose Anibal Castillo via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2021 7:43 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Jose Anibal Castillo Subject: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 In section 7.10.1.3.1.1 of the nfpa 14, 201

Re: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
Jose Anibal Castillo via Sprinklerforum > Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:43 AM > To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org > Cc: Jose Anibal Castillo > Subject: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do no

RE: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread Cary Webber via Sprinklerforum
via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 10:43 AM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Jose Anibal Castillo Subject: NFPA 13R & NFPA 14 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the se

RE: [EXTERNAL] NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
13R & NFPA 14 In section 7.10.1.3.1.1 of the nfpa 14, 2019 states that in cases where 13R system demand is higher than the standpipe demand it is supposed to be chosen the higher demand. Is it even possible to have a residential sprinkler system with a higher demand than the stand

NFPA 13R & NFPA 14

2021-02-04 Thread Jose Anibal Castillo via Sprinklerforum
In section 7.10.1.3.1.1 of the nfpa 14, 2019 states that in cases where 13R system demand is higher than the standpipe demand it is supposed to be chosen the higher demand. Is it even possible to have a residential sprinkler system with a higher demand than the standpipe? Regards José A.