This would have been based on NFPA 231, 1974 edition. Class III storage, 25
ft high. Basic density of 0.19 over 4000 but a 140% density multiplier for
25 ft storage. In those days Class III was wood, paper, natural fiber cloth
or products thereof with or without pallets. Products contain a limi
-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Matsuda,
Richard
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 3:09 PM
To: sprinklerfo...@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
Craig,
>From 1987 NFPA-231, Class 3 to 20-feet required .19/4000...and about 138%
>increase for 25-feet is about .26/4000.
Or as Lar
2014 1:59 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
0.26 / 4000 looks a lot like Class IV Commodities, palletized or solid pile
storage to 20 ft, with ordinary-temperature sprinklers. Check out Figure
14.2.4.1 in your 2007 edition of NFPA 13. The curves haven't cha
...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of David Autry
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 11:45 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
In my 1983 Edition, .26/4000 is "above" the Extra Hazard Group 1. It may have
come from 231C?
David Autry
Meininger Fire Protection Inc.
2
forum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of David Autry
Sent: March-24-14 2:45 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
In my 1983 Edition, .26/4000 is "above" the Extra Hazard Group 1. It may have
come from 231C?
David Autry
Meininger Fire
Craig,
I wonder if that far back that the design parameters were from 231
or 231C instead of -13? I have some old copies but not sure how far
back the run.
*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, CA 92025-5053
*Phone 760.745.6181*
Visit our
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Parsley
Consulting
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 2:47 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: 1978 NFPA 13 question
Craig,
I
[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of
craig.pr...@ch2m.com
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 1:48 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
I would think it would be from 231 since there are no racks in the
warehouse.
Craig L. Prahl, CET
Fire
, 2014 2:45 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: 1978 NFPA 13 question
In my 1983 Edition, .26/4000 is "above" the Extra Hazard Group 1. It may have
come from 231C?
David Autry
Meininger Fire Protection Inc.
2521 W L St. Suite No.4
Lincoln, Ne 68522
Voice (402
In my 1983 Edition, .26/4000 is "above" the Extra Hazard Group 1. It may
have come from 231C?
David Autry
Meininger Fire Protection Inc.
2521 W L St. Suite No.4
Lincoln, Ne 68522
Voice (402) 466-2616
Fax (402) 466-2617
da...@mfp-inc.com
-Original Message-
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@l
10 matches
Mail list logo
