That was then. This is now. I was still young on 1994. No longer the case.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 20, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Gary Stites wrote:
>
> The 1994 edition of nfpa 13 had an exception for lateral and longitudinal
> braces when rods were less than 6"
>> On Sep 19, 2014 10:43 AM, "Stev
The 1994 edition of nfpa 13 had an exception for lateral and longitudinal
braces when rods were less than 6"
On Sep 19, 2014 10:43 AM, "Steve Leyton" wrote:
> There isn't an exception for longitudinal bracing. The exception for
> lateral bracing is where the distance from the point of anchorage
, September 19, 2014 10:43 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org; sprinklerfo...@firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: No Longitudinal Bracing
There isn't an exception for longitudinal bracing. The exception for lateral
bracing is where the distance from the point of anchorage
(concrete deck, in
There isn't an exception for longitudinal bracing. The exception for
lateral bracing is where the distance from the point of anchorage
(concrete deck, in this case) to the top of pipe is 6" or less. The
standard used to say where rods were 6" or less, but now it's the
distance from the anchor to
