RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Cahill, Christopher
vember 30, 2012 12:45 PM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms none of us likes gray Chris, least of all we engineering technicians, since our job is to ensure the intent of you EORs and AHJs is APPLIED to the physical reality of the field. To do this we need measuring dev

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Todd Williams
> > > >-Original Message- >From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org >[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Todd Williams >Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:51 AM >To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >Subject: RE: Sprinklers under p

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread bcasterline
one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For *Registered in: MN -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Law, Kevin W Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:34 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Cahill, Christopher
inal Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Law, Kevin W Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:34 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms We have a similar question about the need for s

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread bcasterline
e >Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 >Direct - 864.599.4102 >Fax - 864.599.8439 >CH2MHILL Extension 74102 >craig.pr...@ch2m.com > > > >-Original Message- >From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Craig.Prahl
rinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona >Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:12 AM >To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org >Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms > >Craig, > >We just had a similar case yesterday where we successfully used this section >to

Re: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread tcf...@bellsouth.net
sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:12 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Sprinklers under platforms I was going to say indoors does not make trash accumulation a non-issue

Re: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Ron Greenman
509-531-0093 > > -Original Message- > From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org > [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron > Greenman > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:12 AM > To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org > Subject: Re: Sprinklers u

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Law, Kevin W
-8296 Cell 509-531-0093 -Original Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Ron Greenman Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:12 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Sprinklers under platforms I was go

Re: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Ron Greenman
; >Craig L. Prahl, CET > >Fire Protection > >CH2MHILL > >Lockwood Greene > >1500 International Drive > >Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 > >Direct - 864.599.4102 > >Fax - 864.599.8439 > >CH2MHILL Extension 74102 > >craig.pr...@ch2m.com > >

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Todd Williams
gt;1500 International Drive >Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 >Direct - 864.599.4102 >Fax - 864.599.8439 >CH2MHILL Extension 74102 >craig.pr...@ch2m.com > > > >-Original Message- >From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org >[mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@f

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Craig.Prahl
sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Rod DiBona Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:12 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms Craig, We just had a similar case yesterday where we successfully used this s

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Rod DiBona
Craig, We just had a similar case yesterday where we successfully used this section to eliminate coverage. This platform was not grated however. I think the heart of the question is does this meet the 8.15.2 (3) requirement of tight construction? I had it in my mind that this was to slow fire m

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread bcasterline
From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Cahill, Christopher Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 7:01 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms Is it enclosed concealed space under the platform ex

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread RFletcher
al Message- From: sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Cahill, Christopher Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 7:01 AM To: sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.org Subject: RE: Sprinklers under platforms Is it enclosed concealed space under the pla

RE: Sprinklers under platforms

2012-11-30 Thread Cahill, Christopher
Is it enclosed concealed space under the platform except for the perforated deck? Guess I haven't seen any equipment platform that is enclosed underneath making them all need heads. But if it meets #1 and the only question is tight yeah I think so. I think the requirement is to keep trash out