NFPA 88A 2015 edition: 9.2.4.1 –
Very helpful …
John Irwin
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Travis Mack
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:47 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Robotic Parking
You are going to have to get the EOR that created your
[400dpiLogoCropped]
36 Barren Road
East Stroudsburg, PA 18302
Office: 973-670-2627
m...@knssprinkler.com<mailto:m...@knssprinkler.com>
From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf
Of Travis Mack
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:47 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Robotic Parkin
> *Sent:* Friday, July 13, 2018 11:38 AM
> *To:* sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> *Subject:* Re: Robotic Parking
>
>
>
> If this is the “car stackers” mentioned in 2016 edition, then it is only
> for 2 levels high.
>
> Travis Mack, SET
>
> MFP Design, LLC
>
t;
>
> John Irwin, C.E.T. – jo...@cfcsystems.com
> Commercial Fire and Communications
> Fire Sprinkler Specialist – NICET ID: 134153
> Cell: 727-282-9243
>
> From: Sprinklerforum On
> Behalf Of Travis Mack
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:38 AM
> To: sprinklerfo
Behalf
Of John Irwin
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:41 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Robotic Parking
This is 7 levels of cars stacked vertically. We are in the 2013 edition of NFPA
13.
John Irwin, C.E.T. – jo...@cfcsystems.com<mailto:jo...@cfcsystems.com>
Com
rforum On Behalf
Of Travis Mack
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:38 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Re: Robotic Parking
If this is the “car stackers” mentioned in 2016 edition, then it is only for 2
levels high.
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
"Follow" us on Fa
8, 11:33 AM John Irwin wrote:
>> Anyone have any experience with these new robotic parking buildings? My
>> “engineered” plans are pretty bad. No hazard is given. I am going to assume
>> the same as a parking garage? I don’t see this as being too challenging, but
>>
n
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:34 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: Robotic Parking
Anyone have any experience with these new robotic parking buildings? My
"engineered" plans are pretty bad. No hazard is given. I am going to assume the
same as a parking gar
2016 Edition of 13 calls these Extra Hazard. These are a challenge to say
the least. Good luck. I wish I had a better answer for you.
Nick Maneen
704-791-7789
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:33 AM John Irwin wrote:
> Anyone have any experience with these new robotic parking buildings?
Anyone have any experience with these new robotic parking buildings? My
"engineered" plans are pretty bad. No hazard is given. I am going to assume
the same as a parking garage? I don't see this as being too challenging, but
I am wondering if there is some huge pitfall that I am not awar
10 matches
Mail list logo