On 7/28/07, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
those are fine with me. if someone could add a ticket and/or
implement that would be helpful.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/696
--
Gaëtan de Menten
http://openhex.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
your best option is probably to keep the objects in a session that's
specifically for the global objects. Most important is that if you
are using multiple threads, you never call flush() on this session.
With regards to threadsafety in this case, as long as the session is
not used for a flush()
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 14:36:45 -
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your best option is probably to keep the objects in a session that's
specifically for the global objects. Most important is that if you
are using multiple threads, you never call flush() on this session.
With
On Jul 28, 5:36 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
your best option is probably to keep the objects in a session that's
specifically for the global objects. Most important is that if you
are using multiple threads, you never call flush() on this session.
With regards to threadsafety
In the following code, I intended that nothing will be inserted into
the table because the transaction fails and is rolled back. What
actually happens is that the first insert is not rolled back because
it s committed by itself.
What is the correct way to achieve my goal?
TIA
from sqlalchemy
Thanks.
Can you point me to the place in the doc where this is discussed?
I was under the impression that I had one connection only in this
scenario.
TIA
On Jul 28, 11:09 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 2:54 PM, mc wrote:
md=BoundMetaData(db)
discussion starts here:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/dbengine.html#dbengine_connections
covers some options available to you including using a thread local
connection.
On Jul 28, 2007, at 5:07 PM, mc wrote:
Thanks.
Can you point me to the place in the doc where this is discussed?
I
On Jul 28, 11:08 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
theres nothing at all wrong with the above; the only adjustments Id
make are to a. leave a global session open for your directory.root,
and b. remove all cascade rules from the parent relation (in this
case using
On Jul 28, 2007, at 8:46 PM, MuTPu4 wrote:
On Jul 28, 11:08 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
theres nothing at all wrong with the above; the only adjustments Id
make are to a. leave a global session open for your directory.root,
and b. remove all cascade rules from the parent
Hello,
I'm using SQLAlchemy to access my WordPress database and I need to
query posts from particular category.
There is a many-to-many mapping between wp_posts and wp_categories
table, throught wp_post2cat table.
I was able to come up with the following code:
cats =
10 matches
Mail list logo
