On 31 Юли, 02:33, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >anyway this seems like bug to me as this will create database-
> >dependence (also AND and OR not working too in MSSQL). i'll try to
> >prepare some general patch to this and send back here (if someone
> >didnot outrun me).
>
Hi,
>anyway this seems like bug to me as this will create database-
>dependence (also AND and OR not working too in MSSQL). i'll try to
>prepare some general patch to this and send back here (if someone
>didnot outrun me).
>
>
Yes, please do. I think you'll find some tweak to MssqlCompiler can
Hi,
>I really like Django's idiom of having an Entity.DoesNotExist exception
>
I'd not heard this before, but I think it's a great idea.
Paul
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To p
Hi,
>The problem is that creating a new object from class Test doesn't set
>the default value for attributes :
>
>
Seems like a good time to bring up a slightly related problem. If you
modify an object in a function providing a default value, the object is
not flushed (unless you do that manu
Hi,
This is TurboGears ticket #1419 http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1419
A fix is in version 1.0.3.2.
Paul
robertz23 wrote:
> Hi, I'm making a project using TurboGears with SqlAlchemy. The
>problem that I think I have is when I make some changes to the DB with
>the webservice I'm maki
I realize that it is probably much too late in the game for this,
but...
I've always thought that returning None for get/get_by when no record
exists is less explicit than raising an exception. I really like
Django's idiom of having an Entity.DoesNotExist exception, such that I
could:
try:
Michael Bayer wrote:
> a lot. no decorators for now.
Not even the way we did on TurboGears that mimics the PEAK decorators? This
way, people can use "@decorator(param)" on Python 2.4+ and can
use "[decorator(param)]" on Python 2.3. At the same place (before the
method / function declaration).
Michael Bayer wrote:
> its a model taken from the way event loops usually work; any consumer
> along the event chain is allowed to say, "ive consumed the event" and
> stop further handlers from dealing with it. we can certainly change
> the names around into something less ridiculous. unfortuante
On Jul 30, 2007, at 3:41 PM, Jonathan LaCour wrote:
>
> Michael Bayer wrote:
>
>> both of your before_update() functions return EXT_PASS. theyll
>> both be
>> called.
>
> Well, yeah. I just found it a little bit odd that I had to do this.
> When I saw EXT_PASS, I didn't think it meant "contin
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Jonathan Ballet wrote:
> No, after a flush(), everything is fine.
> However, I would like to have the default value _before_ flush()-ing.
>
> Hmm, after thinking about it a few more minutes, it would be a bit
> restrictive, since it will work only for 'scalar' values
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> cache. dont know about people, we use it for cache. it's probably
> wrong but what else can be used for cache? identity_map maybe some
> cache but i'm not sure about it...
then you turn off autoflush and transactional.
--~--~-~-
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:03 PM, robertz23 wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm making the flush() when I need to save the data. The problem
> is when I try to see it, I mean, make like a select,
> creating the object and accessing its fields.
>
> Sometimes, my webservice gives me the value that I had before and
>
Michael Bayer wrote:
> both of your before_update() functions return EXT_PASS. theyll both be
> called.
Well, yeah. I just found it a little bit odd that I had to do this.
When I saw EXT_PASS, I didn't think it meant "continue along with other
mapper extensions." It seems like a bad idea for o
do you know how can I accomplish this?
Regards,
Roberto Zapata
On Jul 30, 2:03 pm, robertz23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I'm making the flush() when I need to save the data. The problem
> is when I try to see it, I mean, make like a select,
> creating the object and accessing its fields.
your _own_ ctor, or something around mapperExtension?
On Monday 30 July 2007 21:26:44 Jonathan Ballet wrote:
> No, after a flush(), everything is fine.
> However, I would like to have the default value _before_
> flush()-ing.
>
> Hmm, after thinking about it a few more minutes, it would be a bit
On 30 juil, 19:36, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cant reproduce. Heres a test script which runs fine for me with PG 8.1:
>
> from sqlalchemy import *
>
> metadata = MetaData('postgres://scott:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/test')
>
> test = Table('test', metadata,
> Column('id', Integer, pri
> .save() does not call .flush. flush is called only when a Query is
> executed, or if you call flush() yourself.
ahha. write changes just before u read again...
That may mean that Querying may not be always a readonly operation as
whole. Do underline this one in the docs, as it may cause gre
Yes, I'm making the flush() when I need to save the data. The problem
is when I try to see it, I mean, make like a select,
creating the object and accessing its fields.
Sometimes, my webservice gives me the value that I had before and
sometimes, when I refresh the page several times
it changes t
I can probably do this tonight.
How many people are still using 2.3? Decorator syntax would be nice for this.
Also it would be nice to not have to remember that I can't use genexps
in SA code.
But 2.3 is a pretty good base, I don't miss much else from 2.4. :)
On 7/30/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL
On Jul 30, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> I can probably do this tonight.
>
> How many people are still using 2.3? Decorator syntax would be
> nice for this.
a lot. no decorators for now.
>
> Also it would be nice to not have to remember that I can't use genexps
> in SA code.
On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:34 PM, robertz23 wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm making a project using TurboGears with SqlAlchemy. The
> problem that I think I have is when I make some changes to the DB with
> the webservice I'm making or directly using MySQL shell. What happens
> next is that sometimes when
Cant reproduce. Heres a test script which runs fine for me with PG 8.1:
from sqlalchemy import *
metadata = MetaData('postgres://scott:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/test')
test = Table('test', metadata,
Column('id', Integer, primary_key=True),
Column('test_value', Boolean, default=False, nullabl
Hi, I'm making a project using TurboGears with SqlAlchemy. The
problem that I think I have is when I make some changes to the DB with
the webservice I'm making or directly using MySQL shell. What happens
next is that sometimes when I refresh the page it shows me the value I
had before (Alth
Hi,
we ran into a small problem today, related to default values for
table's columns. Here an example :
test = Table('test', metadata,
Column('id', Integer, primary_key=True),
Column('test_value', Boolean, default=False, nullable=False)
)
class Test(object):pass
test_mapper = mapper(Test
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as long as u have both ways (autoflush/noauto, trans/notrans) on same
> object - flags etc - and the difference is well documented, and the
> usage patterns of both (or are there 4 combinations) are explained...
of course the flags will be
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:11 AM, yish wrote:
>
> Hi, I decided to explore Pylons and was going through the QuickView
> tutorial when I came across a problem.
>
> I am getting the following exception:
>
> page = model.Page.get_by(title=u'FrontPage')
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> "SQLE
On Jul 30, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Arun Kumar PG wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I am using SA with MySQL. I am trying to update a record by making
> a call to session.update(obj). In response I am getting
> "ConcurrentModificationError: Updated rowcount 0 does not match
> number of objects updated 1"
>
> Wh
ive considered this so if someone is willing to submit a patch that
would be great.
On Jul 30, 2007, at 1:46 AM, Michael Pearson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are there plans to print warnings when deprecated methods are used?
>
> I've just spent the morning future-proofing our code against SA 0.4
> and
Guys,
I am using SA with MySQL. I am trying to update a record by making a call to
session.update(obj). In response I am getting "ConcurrentModificationError:
Updated rowcount 0 does not match number of objects updated 1"
What are the possible reasons for this error?
--
Cheers,
- A
--~--~
Hi,
On 27 Юли, 23:27, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >type. Do you have some idea how to preserve entire boolean semantics
> >in mssql?
>
> I've not tried this but perhaps comparing to 1 does the trick, e.g.
> instead of "a and not b" do "(a = 1) and not (b = 1)"
yes, thanks
30 matches
Mail list logo
