I posted this message in the pylons group but as of yet have received
no response.
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss/browse_frm/thread/093ec04b48e49c3c?hl=en#
I've been looking into this problem a little more. From my reading of
the SQLite documentation there should be a 5 second
That sounds reasonable to me; my knee-jerk thought was that we might need to
worry about memory usage, but these references are only on low-count
instances like tables, columns, sessions and mappers, not ORM object
instances.
On 10/31/07, Paul Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ah sure,
1st step would be to ensure youre on the latest version of sqlite.
second step would be to create a test program illustrating the
behavior using pysqlite only (sqlalchemy doesn't have anything to do
with sqlite lock timeout issues). if you can confirm that the
timeout isnt working in
sorry, i havent been following. two++ dicts ?! this is getting out
of hand. if we have to have any dicts at all, it would be just one
dict. and also, it should be proxied through a property so that if
you dont access it, its never even created. we have this on
ConnectionFairy right
Hello,
Does assign_mapper have any order_by function available to him after
the object has been mapped?
model.py -
myclass_table = sqlalchemy.Table('myClass', metadata, autoload=True)
class myClass(object):
pass
myclassmapper=assign_mapper(session.context,myClass,myclass_table)
Others gave some pointers a while back on using rlike with query
filters. I'm wondering whether there is some way to get rlike with
assign_mapper syntax?
I'm using right now
Resource.select_by( **query_dict )
where query dict is name/val pairs, I'd like to be able to make those
name/val pairs
I think I misunderstood the use of the association proxy -- I don't
think I want to use it in this case anymore...
thx
m
On Oct 31, 6:33 pm, Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have a table (Content) which relates to itself via a many-to-many
relationship through a link table
To do this nicely ticket #767 would have to be fixed, but until then
this should work:
def rlike_match_all(entity, **kwargs):
return and_(*[getattr(entity,
key).comparator.expression_element().op('rlike')(value) for key,value
in kwargs.items()])
and use it by
for now, Resource.query.filter(resource_table.c.somecol.op('rlike')
(value)) will work.
On Nov 1, 2007, at 2:12 PM, iain duncan wrote:
Others gave some pointers a while back on using rlike with query
filters. I'm wondering whether there is some way to get rlike with
assign_mapper syntax?
I have two tables Incident and Entry with a 1:many relationship.
Incident.orr_id is a primary key. Entry.entry_id is a primary key,
and Entry.orr_id is a foreign key. (The column names are a legacy
tradition.) I have the following model and classes:
t_incident = Table(Incident, meta,
On Nov 1, 2007, at 6:41 PM, Mike Orr wrote:
I have two tables Incident and Entry with a 1:many relationship.
Incident.orr_id is a primary key. Entry.entry_id is a primary key,
and Entry.orr_id is a foreign key. (The column names are a legacy
tradition.) I have the following model and
I am quite baffled by the deferred loading behavior on a class
member in the following code (see below). Looks like if I create an
object (t1) with some field (c2) having None as value, then after I
save, commit, and closed the object in a SQLAlchemy session, I cannot
update the c2 field. It will
12 matches
Mail list logo
