Thank you, certainly I meant many-to-many relation. In DB I used 3-
columns table for association (2 foreign keys and 1 primary). May be
the problem was I used secondary-keyword approach. Now I'll try use
3-mappings, to association table too, without using secondary.
Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
The use case is configuration management.
We have complex (SQLAlchemy) objects with many relationships which we wish
to up-version, i.e. we want an exact persistent copy (attribute values and
relationships) of the original object, but with a different identity,
this is close to what i have - bitemporal versions of same object.
i dont have relation to succesors/predecessor (this is assumed from
object_id being same).
the practice shows there are attributes
- which u dont want to copy at all (dontcopy=list e.g. timestamps),
- which u dont want to
hi jason,
after a second thought, i have used your idea for data preloading. it is way
more pythonic and portable that ddl.
thanks again,
alex
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:45 PM, jason kirtland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alex bodnaru wrote:
hello friends,
i wanted to do a few sql commands in a
I 've created a model with two tables in which the many to many
relationship was implemented. Item and Category. I appended two
categorys to one item for example. But as i wanted to show the item's
attribute category content in the view i got instead some datas
below:
mosst.model.page.Category
I am thinking about moving from home grown data access classes, to
sqlalchemy for a simple ETL tool for moving from legacy databases - at
least for the Extract and simplest of Transformations.
Example of what I'm trying to achieve.. if I have a customer table in
the legacy database, and a
Figured it out. slight issue with documentation confused me
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/plugins.html#plugins_declarative
'instruments' should read 'descriptor'?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Tim Jones wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
The use case is configuration management.
We have complex (SQLAlchemy) objects with many relationships which
we wish to up-version, i.e. we want an exact persistent copy
(attribute values and
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 17:59:55 Michael Bayer wrote:
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Tim Jones wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
The use case is configuration management.
We have complex (SQLAlchemy) objects with many relationships
which we wish to up-version, i.e. we
hi
is there an official way to undo creation and setup of a complex
object? esp. its relations...
lets say there is A with references and collections and many2manys.
def setup():
my_b = query(B).first()
my_X = query(X).first()
a = A()#in case of creating_new
a.name = 'abc'
Michael,
I get the idea thanks.
Before I embarked on this - I wanted to check that there was not a simple
way that I had overlooked.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Tim
2008/9/10 Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 10, 2008, at 4:39 AM, Tim Jones wrote:
Michael,
Thanks for your
I was wondering what the maximum size of text or blob objects that
sqlalchemy can deal with. The MySQL documents say that the maximum
size is determined by the size of the maximum allowed packet on both
the client and the server. I know how to configure the server, but
I'm not sure what to do
now I have a real question based on example 1 above.
i.e. wanting an object with the following attributes:
customer.o_cutype
customer.id
customer.type (converted from cutype through mapping function)
from
create table old_customer (cunr number, cutype char(1));
The following works:
PREFIX
Yep:
m = sqlalchemy.orm.class_mapper(User)
Thanks a lot!
*:-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To
14 matches
Mail list logo