On 8 Nov., 22:03, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh sorry, also count() is meant to count instances of a single kind of
object. So in fact you should be saying:
session.query(UserRss).join(Rss, item).count()
This question is actually coming from the TurboGears group. The
problem
On Nov 9, 2008, at 4:46 AM, Cito wrote:
On 8 Nov., 22:03, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh sorry, also count() is meant to count instances of a single kind
of
object. So in fact you should be saying:
session.query(UserRss).join(Rss, item).count()
This question is actually
On Nov 9, 2008, at 9:39 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Nov 9, 2008, at 4:46 AM, Cito wrote:
On 8 Nov., 22:03, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh sorry, also count() is meant to count instances of a single kind
of
object. So in fact you should be saying:
Thank you Michael.
2008/11/9 Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you need to call ALTER SEQUENCE on your sequences such that they begin
with an integer identifier greater than that of the table they are
being used with.
On Nov 9, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Petr Kobalíček wrote:
I have found some
You're on the right track. The reflection methods are always called
with a Connection that is not shared among any other thread
(connections aren't considered to be threadsafe in any case) so
threadsafety is not a concern.
I think you should look at the mysql dialect sooner rather than
Hi devs,
I have postgres related problem. I'm normally developing with sqlite,
but we are using postgres on the server. The problem is that
sqlalchemy probably remembers primary keys and after database restore
it will start in all tables from 1.
The error is (IntegrityError) duplicate key
To whom it may concern:
I noticed the following thread in this group (the only thing that came
up when I searched for sqlite3 python 2.6):
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy/browse_thread/thread/d6d691b53e93b5e5/78a57bae1aefd59d
And then I found the following on the page for What's New
you need to call ALTER SEQUENCE on your sequences such that they begin
with an integer identifier greater than that of the table they are
being used with.
On Nov 9, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Petr Kobalíček wrote:
I have found some material about this and this is called 'sequences'
in postgres
I have found some material about this and this is called 'sequences'
in postgres terminology.
So I know the problem, but I don't know how to synchronize sequences
using sqlalchemy.
Cheers
- Petr
2008/11/9 Petr Kobalíček [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi devs,
I have postgres related problem. I'm
