On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 03:14, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
it says to me:
Congratulations!
[Valid RSS] This is a valid RSS feed.
im not able to reproduce any issue in the straight FF reader.
Seems like somebody else fixed it, because it works today.
--
Gaëtan de
Hi everyone!
I have a simple one-to-many relation between two classes, and I'm
trying to serialize/deserialize an any restriction on them.. My
problem is that deserialization fails with maximum recursion depth
exceeded.
Am I doing something wrong?
Here's my testcase:
from sqlalchemy import
I have written a descriptor for implementing hashed storage of
passwords. I added some documentation and added it to the wiki as a
recipe:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/HashProperty
It doesn't depend on anything in SQLAlchemy and works with any object
persistence framework.
that was a bug, fixed in 5802.
On Feb 17, 2009, at 5:48 AM, Joril wrote:
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String, ForeignKey
from sqlalchemy.ext import serializer
from sqlalchemy.orm import relation
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
# Tables definition
Base =
Hi all,
I wonder what this message mean:
TimeoutError: QueuePool limit of size 5 overflow 10 reached, connection timed
out, timeout 30
any ideas?
jo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy
We have sets of databases with several hundred tables per database.
Most of these tables are linked using various foreign key
relationships. Is there any sort of automatic SQL Alchemy generation?
Either SQL Soup like loading or a script that gets run once that
generates code for use.
-Gp
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Gp gpm...@gmail.com wrote:
We have sets of databases with several hundred tables per database.
Most of these tables are linked using various foreign key
relationships. Is there any sort of automatic SQL Alchemy generation?
Either SQL Soup like loading or
I'm using the declarative extension. When I specify a backref on a
relation, I see the order_by argument and I'm pointing it to the
column object. That works, but I need to sort the backref
descendingly, not ascendingly. I don't see an option for that in the
Relation()/backref() arguments. What
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Ken kkin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm using the declarative extension. When I specify a backref on a
relation, I see the order_by argument and I'm pointing it to the
column object. That works, but I need to sort the backref
descendingly, not ascendingly. I don't
On Feb 17, 3:13 pm, Michael Trier mtr...@gmail.com wrote:
backref supports the same arguments as relation(), which include an order_by
argument.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/reference/orm/mapping.html?highligh...
Michael, I'm using the order_by argument. The problem is that it's
sorting
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Ken kkin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 17, 3:13 pm, Michael Trier mtr...@gmail.com wrote:
backref supports the same arguments as relation(), which include an
order_by
argument.
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/reference/orm/mapping.html?highligh...
On Feb 17, 3:29 pm, Michael Trier mtr...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I misunderstood. You should be able to do a order_by=field.desc().
Ah, that answers my question. Thanks!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
According to Autocode's readme it doesn't support relationships. The
major reason that Soup won't work for me is it doesn't support
relationships between tables. I'm still going to take a closer look at
Autocode. Thanks for the suggestion.
-Paul
On Feb 17, 4:09 pm, Michael Trier mtr...@gmail.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
