On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 02:48:12PM -0400, Michael Bayer wrote:
add passive_deletes = True
Thanks and sorry for the noise on such trivial question, present in the
faq... , I've already used it and... forgot!
sandro
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
In faq 5.13 it's explained why setting bar.foo_id would not generate the
object bar.foo.
I stumble in the same problem when creating a Movie in an example with
Director/Movie and a relation -'movies' on director- that has
'delete-orphan'.
running::
f = m.Movie(title=my title)
[Sorry for reposting, Erroneously sent to another thread.]
In faq 5.13 it's explained why setting bar.foo_id would not generate the
object bar.foo.
I stumble in the same problem when creating a Movie in an example with
Director/Movie and a relation -'movies' on director- that has
Robert,
robert rottermann wrote:
...
however I would like to change the assignMyselfToCompany method in a way that
I
could achieve the same with:
product = tblProducts_kl()
product.assignMyselfToCompany(company_id)
Unless you do some more things in your assignMyselfToCompany I think
Werner F. Bruhin schrieb:
Robert,
robert rottermann wrote:
...
however I would like to change the assignMyselfToCompany method in a way
that I
could achieve the same with:
product = tblProducts_kl()
product.assignMyselfToCompany(company_id)
Unless you do some more things in your
On Jul 25, 2009, at 3:57 AM, robert rottermann wrote:
Michael Bayer schrieb:
robert rottermann wrote:
hi there,
how can an instance of a class with a Table bound to it
access the values of the values of its db record?
what I would like to do is something like the following:
class
On Jul 25, 2009, at 5:19 AM, Alessandro Dentella wrote:
In faq 5.13 it's explained why setting bar.foo_id would not generate
the
object bar.foo.
I stumble in the same problem when creating a Movie in an example with
Director/Movie and a relation -'movies' on director- that has
On Jul 25, 2009, at 7:24 AM, robert rottermann wrote:
Werner F. Bruhin schrieb:
this is exactly what I would like to do *within* the instance by
calling one of
its methods.
the reason is, that there are many different product-types and each
one has its
own class that uses a common
On Jul 24, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
Michael Bayer wrote:
Victor Lin wrote:
It is a TODO within SQLAlchemy for this particular operation to not
trigger an unnecessary load.
I've added a patch as well as your test as
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/1483 to address
