Michael Bayer schrieb:
I had the idea that since a1 appears to be in the collections of both u1
and u2, it would be arbitrary where a1 ended up after the flush
completed. But that is likely wrong, in that the flush() is going to look
at change events to determine what state changes to
Hi everybody,
I m stuck with a query about telephone number :
I want to find in my database all the contact who have a telephone number.
The difficulty is that some number in the database can have space or .
between numbers
example : 06.06.50.44.11 or 45 87 12 45 65
This my query with like but
Greetings Alchemists,
this is more of a general data modeling question but maybe Alchemy has
a neat trick to resolve this issue.
It happens quite often that I want to use instances of a class as
attributes of unrelated objects. One example is Addresses. Both
Companies and Persons have
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
Michael Bayer schrieb:
I had the idea that since a1 appears to be in the collections of both
u1
and u2, it would be arbitrary where a1 ended up after the flush
completed. But that is likely wrong, in that the flush() is going to
look
at change events to
Yannick Gingras wrote:
Greetings Alchemists,
this is more of a general data modeling question but maybe Alchemy has
a neat trick to resolve this issue.
It happens quite often that I want to use instances of a class as
attributes of unrelated objects. One example is Addresses. Both
On October 9, 2009, Conor wrote:
I think your best solution is similar to your AddressMap idea above, but
just make it part of Address instead with check and unique constraints
on your FK columns: [...]
The check constraint above is a bit overkill for just 2 FK columns (you
could just use
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
[mailto:sqlalch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Yannick Gingras
Sent: 09 October 2009 14:43
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Duck-typing style of relations
Greetings Alchemists,
this is more of a
Confirmed by Alex Grönholm on #postgresql on freenode with pg 8.3 and sqla
0.5.6. If this is not a bug, i'd like to know what is going on. Typing the
text in gq directly into psql (all on one line) produces the schema foo as
expected.
did you commit your transaction or set autocommit=True in your text()
statement ? that string you have will not trip off SQLA's autocommit
feature.
Faheem Mitha wrote:
Confirmed by Alex Grönholm on #postgresql on freenode with pg 8.3 and sqla
0.5.6. If this is not a bug, i'd like to know
I have been using the following recipe to keep a unique string table
in our database:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/UniqueObject
After upgrading to 5.6, I started getting the following error
Instance UniqueName XXX is not persistent within this Session
1. Does
This is not really a sqlalchemy question, but the quick answer is that
you need to convert both your indexed data and your queries to the
same normal form. In your example, you appear to be correctly
stripping spaces and periods in your query. If you haven't done that
in the database, then you
[This message has also been posted.]
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:28:58 -0400, Michael Bayer
mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
did you commit your transaction or set autocommit=True in your text()
statement ? that string you have will not trip off SQLA's autocommit
feature.
Hi,
Thanks for the
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Can you explain why removing the SET search_path TO public; string
makes a commit happen? You also say that string you have will not
trip off SQLA's autocommit feature. How does this autocommit
feature work, and are there certain strings that
13 matches
Mail list logo
