Hi,
I've been looking into performance bottlenecks in my app and I noticed
that importing the sqlalchemy module itself takes 100 msec. It might
seem pedantic to be worried about 100 msec, but it seems like an
unnecessary startup cost. Have you considered ways of making
sqlalchemy modules faster
On Dec 6, 2009, at 11:09 AM, andres wrote:
Hi,
I've been looking into performance bottlenecks in my app and I noticed
that importing the sqlalchemy module itself takes 100 msec. It might
seem pedantic to be worried about 100 msec, but it seems like an
unnecessary startup cost. Have you
Hi All,
Let me preface this with: I know that long running transactions in a
web app are a worse idea than that trying to forge steel in a mould
made of butter.
With that out of the way; I have inherited a django web app that
connects to many databases (this isn't starting well). These databases
Hi,
It seems that although would work fine in place of a ClauseElement
when passed to filter(), but not so when passed to the onclause
parameter of join() ?
There doesn't seem to be anything in the ClauseElement class that will
convert a string to something of type ClauseElement. Have I missed
Sorry, I should have looked at the source first.
sql.text(string) should fix it.
On Dec 7, 5:22 pm, Kalium raymond.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems that although would work fine in place of a ClauseElement
when passed to filter(), but not so when passed to the onclause
parameter of