Hi Mike!
Thank you very much for your help.
It hasn indeed solved my problem.
On Aug 10, 4:23 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
query=session.query(Address)
query=query.join((User, Address.user))
query=query.join((Group, User.group))
Yes, and I indeed need this form to
just for the typo
It hasn indeed solved my problem.
It has solved my problem.
Everything works fine now :-).
Cheers,
Michael
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To
On Aug 10, 2010, at 11:20 PM, botz wrote:
oops, didn't mean to submit that quite yet. crazy dog...
anyways, given that I have foo_props() which acts as a kind of from-
clause
as in
select * from foo_props( 123);
I'd like to use that in relationship to a Foo class
i.e.
mapper(
Hey everyone,
I *think* this is a limitation of having classes that are
polymorphic_on a join (instead of mapping a join), but I'm going to
ask anyway to make sure I understand.
I have a hierarchy of mappers to represent various network interfaces
on various devices. This is polymorphic_on a
On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:51 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
Hey everyone,
I *think* this is a limitation of having classes that are
polymorphic_on a join (instead of mapping a join), but I'm going to
ask anyway to make sure I understand.
I have a hierarchy of mappers to represent various
Thanks for that... I didn't manage to get it to work straight off, but
it seems like I'm close.
Tried a couple things just to force it to behave as I wanted.
# defined the selectable
selectable = select( [ sql.column( 'x' ), sql.column('y')],
from_obj =
[
And really if I could just plug in the argument for the foo_props
call, at least in this case it would remove the need for the foreign
key altogether as the join is really handled by the semantics of the
foo_props call, which happens to only return the one related row.
I suppose this could all be
On Aug 11, 2010, at 1:19 PM, botz wrote:
Thanks for that... I didn't manage to get it to work straight off, but
it seems like I'm close.
Tried a couple things just to force it to behave as I wanted.
# defined the selectable
selectable = select( [ sql.column( 'x' ), sql.column('y')],
On Aug 11, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
What is implied by relationship() is that you're joining and limiting a full
set of records using a join condition. This implies that the mapped
selectable would be returning a set of rows corresponding to all possible
child
