On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
standard Session class make a difference?
the unit of work issues INSERTS in order for a single kind of entity.It
doesn't do that across all entities since the
Hi I'm wondering if someone could help me with SQLAlchemy and WHERE
clauses since I'm having trouble putting a query together.
What I want in my WHERE clause is the below, noting the brackets:
WHERE
(game_participation.was_a_sub = %s AND game_participation.was_subbed
= %s) OR
On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
standard Session class make a difference?
the unit of work issues INSERTS in order for a single kind of entity.It
On Feb 27, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Feb 27, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 27/02/2011 06:34, Michael Bayer wrote:
More interestingly, why does the use of sessionmaker versus the use of the
standard Session class make a difference?
the unit of work
On Feb 27, 2011, at 8:12 AM, stoneferry wrote:
Hi I'm wondering if someone could help me with SQLAlchemy and WHERE
clauses since I'm having trouble putting a query together.
What I want in my WHERE clause is the below, noting the brackets:
WHERE
(game_participation.was_a_sub = %s AND
Hi All,
I'm reading
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/browser/examples/versioning/history_meta.py?rev=7253:3ef75b251d06
and I'm curious about the following in line 112-114:
- what does iterate_to_root do?
- why do we need to iterate over the object mappers and the history mappers?
- what does
On Feb 27, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I'm reading
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/browser/examples/versioning/history_meta.py?rev=7253:3ef75b251d06
and I'm curious about the following in line 112-114:
- what does iterate_to_root do?
return the hierarchy of mappers
Hi All,
In the before_flush of a SessionExtension, is there any way I can tell
if an object is in session.deleted as a result of being deleted in its
own right or as a result of being cascaded from the delete of another
object?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch
Hi All,
I'm pleased to announce a new release of mortar_rdb.
This package ties together SQLAlchemy, sqlalchemy-migrate and
the component architecture to make it easy to develop projects
using SQLAlchemy through their complete lifecycle.
This release allows you to register SessionExtensions
hmm ! not really actually. Also, some deletes, such as for de-associated
orphans, don't get added to delete until after before_flush().
On Feb 27, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
In the before_flush of a SessionExtension, is there any way I can tell if an
object is in
A few days ago I asked what appears in the body of the message, a few
lines below. To summarize:
Let's say I have a class User (yeah, to define users in my
application) and each user can belong to one UserGroup (another
class of my application). The User class would be something like:
class
On Feb 27, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Hector Blanco wrote:
A few days ago I asked what appears in the body of the message, a few
lines below. To summarize:
Let's say I have a class User (yeah, to define users in my
application) and each user can belong to one UserGroup (another
class of my
On 27/02/2011 23:20, Michael Bayer wrote:
hmm ! not really actually.
No probs, I thought that'd be a bit of a stretch ;-)
Also, some deletes, such as for de-associated orphans, don't get added to
delete until after before_flush().
Hmm, does this imply that the versioning recipes that
On Feb 28, 2011, at 1:26 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
On 27/02/2011 23:20, Michael Bayer wrote:
hmm ! not really actually.
No probs, I thought that'd be a bit of a stretch ;-)
Also, some deletes, such as for de-associated orphans, don't get added to
delete until after before_flush().
14 matches
Mail list logo
