понедельник, 3 февраля 2014 г., 19:13:04 UTC+2 пользователь Michael Bayer
написал:
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alexander Belchenko
> >
> wrote:
>
> this is a Py3k-specific issue, ticket
> http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2933 has been created and the issue
> is fixed in 8b08b1a35b
pullreq is great and i left some comments.
On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:14 PM, Erich Blume wrote:
> I've sumitted a Pull Request for this feature:
> https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/pull/65
>
> Let me know if you would prefer the PR in some other format, like a
> format-patch or something (or on
I've sumitted a Pull Request for this feature:
https://github.com/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/pull/65
Let me know if you would prefer the PR in some other format, like a
format-patch or something (or on bitbucket or wherever).
As I mentioned in the PR, I included a PEP8 cleanup for `
dialects.sqlite.base.p
just call configure_mappers() for now, and the need for that step has been
removed in b069127b2d3f7b3f2c27f91cf,
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/ticket/2935.
On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Matthew Phipps wrote:
> Hi SQLAlchemy,
>
> On SQLAlchemy 0.9.2, if I construct a query selecting a composit
Hi SQLAlchemy,
On SQLAlchemy 0.9.2, if I construct a query selecting a composite property
before constructing any other queries, I see this error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/badmin/.virtualenvs/bridge-it/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py",
line 197, in runTe
On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Josh Kuhn wrote:
> Would I be correct in assuming this Version object won't be in the same
> identity map as the other Version objects?
no, the identity mapping is based on the class + primary key, so as long as the
primary key consists of the same columns (i don’
On Feb 3, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Alexander Belchenko
wrote:
> I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but I can't get sqlalchemy working with
> MySQL and PyMySQL driver. The driver works with my db. But SQLAlchemy blows
> with traceback. Any hints, please?
>
> Here is testing script:
>
> File
>
Would I be correct in assuming this Version object won't be in the same
identity map as the other Version objects?
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Josh Kuhn wrote:
>
> This is pretty amazing. I get it to *almost* work. The issue seems to be
I have no idea what I'm doing wrong, but I can't get sqlalchemy working
with MySQL and PyMySQL driver. The driver works with my db. But SQLAlchemy
blows with traceback. Any hints, please?
Here is testing script:
#!/usr/bin/python3
import sys
print('sys.version: %s' % sys.version)
import pymys
On Feb 3, 2014, at 2:39 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote:
>
> I guess I didn't make it clear enough that I'm talking mainly about
> this collections issue. Sorry about that; let me try again:
> I feel it would be much more convenient if the state achieved by a savepoint
> was reflected by collecti
10 matches
Mail list logo
