Hi there,
Just wondering if there is some tool out there that will just connect to an
existing database, do a bunch of magic, and output a file with the Table
and Column objects all nice and defined for me? That way I can go about
using column names in select statements, ect?
The larger
if you actually want code generation there is sqlacodegen:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/sqlacodegen/1.1.4
On Apr 26, 2014, at 5:24 AM, Adam Morris adam.morris@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
Just wondering if there is some tool out there that will just connect to an
existing database, do
Hi, I've been to the IRC channel and gotten alot of help from inklesspen,
but I can't seem to figure this out.
I have these tree tables;
Users
- iduser
- name
Companies
- idcompany
- name
CompaniesUsers
- companyid
- userid
- owner (TINYINT|Boolean)
Now in my Company class I want
hi all!
as some already know, sqlite3 version 3.8.x (i'm not quite sure if it's
3.8.x, i might be wrong), but it has now support for recursivity using
the with operator: https://sqlite.org/lang_with.html [1]
well - probably mike can answear this better - will sqla provide basic
support for
On Apr 26, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Peder Husom pederhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I've been to the IRC channel and gotten alot of help from inklesspen,
but I can't seem to figure this out.
I have these tree tables;
Users
- iduser
- name
Companies
- idcompany
- name
CompaniesUsers
what happens if you just try it? the syntax looks entirely standard.
On Apr 26, 2014, at 2:10 PM, Richard Gerd Kuesters rich...@humantech.com.br
wrote:
hi all!
as some already know, sqlite3 version 3.8.x (i'm not quite sure if it's
3.8.x, i might be wrong), but it has now support for
On Apr 26, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
If OTOH you do in fact want this query to take the current Company.id into
account, this would be simple using primaryjoin/secondaryjoin/secondary, it
just requires that the IN is unwrapped into a regular join
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 12:29:50 AM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Apr 25, 2014, at 6:54 PM, Tim Kersten t...@io41.com javascript:
wrote:
This is an unusual use case because it seems like you’d like to outright
ignore the row if it doesn’t match? or are you throwing an exception if
On Apr 26, 2014, at 3:26 PM, Tim Kersten t...@io41.com wrote:
The resulting behaviour would be identical to using a version col id, but
only for this transaction and the instance passed to the update_where()
method, and instead of UPDATE ... WHERE pk = %s AND version = %s you'd
have
My project requires querying an externally-managed database as well as a
project-specific database. What I've been doing to date is copying the
external database (which changes very infrequently) into the
project-specific database so I only need one engine and one dbsession. I'm
now trying to
Not sure if __abstract__ is the way to go. Should I instead be creating
mixins?
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/extensions/declarative.html#mixin-and-custom-base-classes
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 5:07:23 PM UTC-4, Brian Findlay wrote:
My project requires querying an
Continuing to troubleshoot. This produces the same exception:
DBSession.configure(binds={DB1: db1_engine, DB2: db1_engine})
Note that I'm binding both classes to the original engine. I thought it
would be the same as the working config:
DBSession.configure(bind=db1_engine)
--
You received
the answer is simple in that the binds argument to Session precedes both
Declarative as well as the advent of the __abstract__ keyword; it typically
expects actual Mapper objects or classes from which a Mapper can be pulled
directly.
For now, you can instead override get_bind() to do whatever
Thanks, Mike. Will check this out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
I'm almost certainly exposing my level of ignorance here, but does this
mean I could just replace
DBSession.configure(binds={DB1:db1_engine, DB2:db2_engine})
with
DBSession.configure(class_=MySession)
?
I suppose I could even use
DBSession = scoped_session(sessionmaker(class_=MySession,
On Apr 26, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Brian Findlay brian.m.find...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm almost certainly exposing my level of ignorance here, but does this mean
I could just replace
DBSession.configure(binds={DB1:db1_engine, DB2:db2_engine})
with
DBSession.configure(class_=MySession)
?
16 matches
Mail list logo
