SQLAlchemy release 1.0.6 is now available.
This release includes a handful of new bugfixes and some small feature
adds, pushed along by a high level of community involvement.
The most critical issue fixed involves the versioning feature of the
ORM, where the version counter of a row could be
SQLAlchemy release 1.0.6 is now available.
This release includes a handful of new bugfixes and some small feature
adds, pushed along by a high level of community involvement.
The most critical issue fixed involves the versioning feature of the
ORM, where the version counter of a row could be
On 6/25/15 12:17 PM, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
Michael,
I had no idea about this versioning.
Looking it up, I first found this in the docs:
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/examples.html#versioning-objects
That didn't look right, so I checked the changelogs and saw some
specifics
Michael,
I had no idea about this versioning.
Looking it up, I first found this in the docs:
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/examples.html#versioning-objects
That didn't look right, so I checked the changelogs and saw some specifics
in the 09 release note.
Looking up those terms, I
I guess they are related. I was just thinking about a link on each page
that says For another type of versioning within SqlAlchemy, click here.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
In the SQLalchemy documentation
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/inheritance.html#basic-control-of-which-tables-are-queried,
it states
It is standard practice that the same column is used for both the role of
primary key as well as foreign key to the parent table, and that the
On 6/25/15 2:08 PM, Kevin Qiu wrote:
In the SQLalchemy documentation
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/orm/inheritance.html#basic-control-of-which-tables-are-queried,
it states
It is standard practice that the same column is used for both the
role of primary key as well as
On 6/25/15 1:34 PM, Kevin Qiu wrote:
Thanks a lot. I assume you mean polymorphic_identity refers to the
table name not the class name. It would be nice that the document can
be point this out explicitly, because the example in the document
shows both table name and class name are both small
