Actually yeah, you are correct on that. I was trying to have separate
backrefs on UserKeywprd and this was part of that.
On Sunday, August 21, 2016, Tom Kedem wrote:
> I see. I think I can do okay without UserKeyword.user, as you suggested.
> Seems to work.
> Though is it
I see. I think I can do okay without UserKeyword.user, as you suggested.
Seems to work.
Though is it really necessary to define user_keywords relationship both on
user and super_user? It seems to be working with only defining it in user.
On Sunday, August 21, 2016 at 9:33:01 PM UTC+3, Mike
On 08/21/2016 10:22 AM, Tom Kedem wrote:
It seems I confused "concrete" with "joined" inheritance.
What I want to achieve is /joined/ inheritance. I've modified the code
to reflect that (just removed all concrete references).
According to the documentation relationships on joined inheritance
It seems I confused "concrete" with "joined" inheritance.
What I want to achieve is *joined* inheritance. I've modified the code to
reflect that (just removed all concrete references).
According to the documentation relationships on joined inheritance are
inherited, but I still get an error