On 08/24/2016 03:09 PM, Gordan Todorovac wrote:
Mike,
python -i ~/python/sq3.py
from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
e = create_engine("sqlite:///:memory:")
Base.metadata.drop_all(e)
Base.metadata.create_all(e)
session=Session(e)
rory=User("rory")
session.
OK, you code is right.
i am fool.
my project table has own data conn class
subtable and maintable get different session.
so is my bug.
Thank You.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Mike,
Thanks for the response! Here is the demonstration, please let me know if
there is something obvious that I am missing:
> cat ~/python/sq3.py
from sqlalchemy import Column, Integer, String, ForeignKey
from sqlalchemy.orm import relationship, backref
from sqlalchemy.ext.associationproxy im
On 08/24/2016 02:26 PM, lone ois wrote:
M2 = SubTable()
_conn.begin_nested()
M1.mainkey - "1"
MainTable has no attribute "mainkey" and I think this means to be an = sign.
M2.number = '1'
M2.name = '1'
_conn.add(M2)
_conn.commit()
except:
_conn.rollback()
else:
_conn.commit(
Hello ALL:
i has 2 table.
_Table_Metadata = declarative_base(cls = DictableModel)
class MainTable(_Table_Metadata):
__tablename__ = 'MainTable'
id = Column(BIGINT, primary_key = True, autoincrement = True, unique = True)
number = Column(Text, unique=True, nullable=False)
name
On 08/24/2016 08:59 AM, Gordan Todorovac wrote:
Hi, all -
I am experiencing the issue described here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14470688/sqlalchemy-bidirectional-relationship-association-proxy
and reported as fixed here
https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/2655
in the la
Hi, all -
I am experiencing the issue described here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14470688/sqlalchemy-bidirectional-relationship-association-proxy
and reported as fixed here
https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/issues/2655
in the latest release version of SQLAlchemy (1.0.14). Summary
On 08/24/2016 04:39 AM, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
Hi all,
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 3:17:55 AM UTC+2, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
I am currently pulling my hair out because I have a solution that I
think should work on the database side (albeit I don't like it), but
I can't f
Hi all,
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 3:17:55 AM UTC+2, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
>
> I am currently pulling my hair out because I have a solution that I think
> should work on the database side (albeit I don't like it), but I can't
> figure out how to do this with sqlalchemy.
> My current go
> On Monday, August 22, 2016 at 11:12:11 AM UTC+2, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
>
> (...)
> Is there a way to hold off this check until after I map this class like
this
>
> my_table = sa.Table("my_table", meta.metadata, autoload=True,
autoload_with=engine)
> orm.mapper(MyClass, my_table)
>
> ?
It appe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Jinghui Niu wrote:
> Hi, I wonder if there is any recommendation or best practice on choosing
> between
> hybrid_property
>
> and
> hybrid_method
> ,
> other than they hybrid_method can take arguments? If I use the hybrid_method
> only throughout, without giving it
11 matches
Mail list logo
